Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 98%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 113%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics106% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive265% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory96GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 96GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory90.1 GB free of 96 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200401
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 02 '20 at 01:30
Run Duration337 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay: 2070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X-$395
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
88.1% Excellent
Memory 75.7
1-Core 141
2-Core 283
89% 167 Pts
4-Core 537
8-Core 1,032
93% 784 Pts
64-Core 2,131
132% 2,131 Pts
Poor: 80%
This bench: 88.1%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070-$200
CLim: 2205 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 451.77
Performing below potential (67th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
106% Outstanding
Lighting 133
Reflection 125
Parallax 128
108% 129 fps
MRender 171
Gravity 127
Splatting 104
106% 134 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 106%
Great: 112%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDS500G3XHC-00SJG0 500GB
274GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 102000WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1144 825 826 828 828 827 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
265% Outstanding
Read 1,996
Write 2,201
Mixed 1,703
SusWrite 880
381% 1,695 MB/s
4K Read 48.7
4K Write 180
4K Mixed 74.9
265% 101 MB/s
DQ Read 1,207
DQ Write 1,010
DQ Mixed 1,095
824% 1,104 MB/s
Poor: 184%
This bench: 265%
Great: 288%
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52
233GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 445 449 413 296 297 295 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
111% Outstanding
Read 501
Write 446
Mixed 447
SusWrite 366
99% 440 MB/s
4K Read 44.6
4K Write 91
4K Mixed 57.6
190% 64.4 MB/s
DQ Read 219
DQ Write 186
DQ Mixed 200
151% 202 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 111%
Great: 128%
CT1000MX500SSD4 1TB
347GB free
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 422 426 428 422 427 424 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
109% Outstanding
Read 495
Write 430
Mixed 414
SusWrite 425
99% 441 MB/s
4K Read 36.2
4K Write 88.1
4K Mixed 54.2
171% 59.5 MB/s
DQ Read 219
DQ Write 187
DQ Mixed 186
144% 197 MB/s
Poor: 86%
This bench: 109%
Great: 123%
Team T253X2001T 1TB
3TB free
Firmware: S1022A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 762 459 457 438 405 364 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 30% Great: 105%
Team T253X2001T 1TB
3TB free
Firmware: S1022A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 238 230 771 693 230 229 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 30% Great: 105%
WD My Book 25EE 10TB
4.5TB free, PID 25ee
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 165 164 163 164 165 161 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
86% Excellent
Read 157
Write 168
Mixed 121
SusWrite 164
208% 152 MB/s
4K Read 3.4
4K Write 8.7
4K Mixed 1
342% 4.37 MB/s
DQ Read 0.7
DQ Write 6.6
DQ Mixed 1.3
271% 2.87 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 86%
Great: 99%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CL16-18-18 D4-3200 G.SKILL F4-3200C16-32GTZN CL16-18-18 D4-3200 G.SKILL F4-3200C16-32GTZN 95GB
3200, 3200, 3200, 3200 MHz
16384, 32767, 16384, 32767 MB
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
107% Outstanding
MC Read 43.6
MC Write 38.6
MC Mixed 38.3
115% 40.2 GB/s
SC Read 24.5
SC Write 23.8
SC Mixed 36.2
80% 28.2 GB/s
Latency 88.9
45% 88.9 ns
Poor: 90%
This bench: 107%
Great: 108%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 25,807 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) - $192

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 98% - Outstanding Total price: $932
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback