Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 70%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 77%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 64%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics105% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive112% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory17.1 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191108
Uptime1.4 Days
Run DateAug 02 '20 at 01:24
Run Duration188 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
AMD Ryzen 7 3800X-$310
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
64% Good
Memory 59
1-Core 90.6
2-Core 184
63% 111 Pts
4-Core 369
8-Core 728
68% 549 Pts
64-Core 1,339
90% 1,339 Pts
Poor: 78%
This bench: 64%
Great: 96%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
AMD RX 5700-XT-$391
MSI(1462 3816) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.7.1
Performing below potential (45th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
105% Outstanding
Lighting 350
Reflection 287
Parallax 711
92% 449 fps
MRender 228
Gravity 400
Splatting 350
106% 326 fps
Poor: 99%
This bench: 105%
Great: 114%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Intel 600p Series NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB-$75
101GB free (System drive)
Firmware: PSF109C Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 516 334 108 73 109 109 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
112% Outstanding
Read 823
Write 559
Mixed 506
SusWrite 208
116% 524 MB/s
4K Read 29.7
4K Write 103
4K Mixed 44.7
157% 59 MB/s
DQ Read 277
DQ Write 541
DQ Mixed 321
269% 380 MB/s
Poor: 84%
This bench: 112%
Great: 155%
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52
58GB free
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 410 331 314 313 313 310 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
99% Outstanding
Read 458
Write 403
Mixed 416
SusWrite 332
90% 402 MB/s
4K Read 38.9
4K Write 75
4K Mixed 51
164% 55 MB/s
DQ Read 217
DQ Write 183
DQ Mixed 197
149% 199 MB/s
Poor: 73%
This bench: 99%
Great: 127%
WD Purple 4TB (2014)-$100
2TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 118 117 122 119 119 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
65.3% Good
Read 109
Write 100
Mixed 70.2
SusWrite 118
73% 99.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 0.9
171% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 65.3%
Great: 95%
WD WD10EURX 1TB-$42
558GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 124 124 123 120 121 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
71.7% Very good
Read 128
Write 116
Mixed 68
SusWrite 122
79% 108 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 3
4K Mixed 0.9
189% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 71.7%
Great: 89%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$28
441GB free
Firmware: CC46
SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 120 121 120 120 121 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
69.6% Good
Read 122
Write 109
Mixed 66
SusWrite 120
76% 104 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 1
176% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 69.6%
Great: 72%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 16GB-$8
13GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.7 5.6 4.2 5.5 5.5 4.8 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
7.11% Terrible
Read 29.5
Write 4.3
Mixed 12
SusWrite 5.4
14% 12.8 MB/s
4K Read 4.4
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0.7
47% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 7.11%
Great: 23%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Corsair CMK16GX4M2A2400C14 CMK16GX4M2A2666C16 CMK16GX4M2A2400C14 24GB
2666, 2666, 2666 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
67.2% Good
MC Read 29.7
MC Write 19.9
MC Mixed 28.3
74% 26 GB/s
SC Read 10
SC Write 16.8
SC Mixed 13.9
39% 13.6 GB/s
Latency 131
31% 131 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 20,276 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 103%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 104%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) - $189

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $1,148
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9600K $195Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $230Crucial MX500 250GB $46
Intel Core i5-9400F $154Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $170Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-9700K $350Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super) $510Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $42Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $69SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $69SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $681SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback