Performance Results


Gaming 101% UFO	Desktop 83% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 83% Aircraft carrier


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	137% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3770-$297 278,207 User benchmarks, average bench 69% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4.1 GHz, turbo 4.9 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	74.8% Very good	Memory 90.1 1-Core 111 2-Core 195 77% 132 Pts	4-Core 322 8-Core 502 51% 412 Pts	64-Core 542 34% 542 Pts
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 74.8% Great: 76%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Titan V 869 User benchmarks, average bench 140% Nvidia(10DE 1218) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1912 MHz, MLim: 425 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 451.67 Performing below potential (33^rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	137% Outstanding	Lighting 185 Reflection 191 Parallax 274 151% 217 fps	MRender 189 Gravity 218 Splatting 109 135% 172 fps
Poor: 113% ↑ This bench: 137% Great: 155%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 21GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT01B6Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 478 Write 447 Mixed 383 97% 436 MB/s	4K Read 33.6 4K Write 95.9 4K Mixed 45 159% 58.2 MB/s	DQ Read 388 DQ Write 352 DQ Mixed 366 276% 369 MB/s
Poor: 72% Great: 124%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$130 602,853 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 270GB free Firmware: RVT03B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 442 451 457 447 450 369 MB/s Performing as expected (49^th percentile)	113% Outstanding	Read 488 Write 458 Mixed 432 SusWrite 436 102% 454 MB/s	4K Read 33.7 4K Write 101 4K Mixed 45.8 163% 60 MB/s	DQ Read 389 DQ Write 353 DQ Mixed 344 266% 362 MB/s
Poor: 81% ↑ This bench: 113% Great: 133%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial BLS8G3D1609DS1S00. 3x8GB 495 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 3 of 4 slots used 24GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	56.5% Above average	MC Read 19.9 MC Write 20.2 MC Mixed 18.3 56% 19.5 GB/s	SC Read 15.2 SC Write 18.7 SC Mixed 17.5 49% 17.1 GB/s	Latency 67.1 60% 67.1 ns
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 56.5% Great: 63%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 59%

Gunboat

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 49%

Yacht

RAM
CT102464BD160B.C16 2x8GBCrucialBench 53%, 4,052 samples	16x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBKingstonBench 56%, 28,461 samples	15x
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	14x

Value: 85% - Excellent

Total price: $657

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16