Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 23%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Boot Drive	21.8% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (50%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

PC Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Atom N270 3,302 User benchmarks, average bench 20% U2E1, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.6 GHz Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	23% Poor	Memory 44.6 1-Core 6.6 2-Core 11.2 18% 20.8 Pts	4-Core 11.3 8-Core 11.2 2% 11.2 Pts	64-Core 11.2 1% 11.2 Pts
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 23% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
OCZ Agility 3 120GB-$102 38,562 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 101GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2.22 SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 56 55 52 58 61 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	21.8% Poor	Read 104 Write 69.4 Mixed 82.6 SusWrite 58.4 18% 78.7 MB/s	4K Read 15.6 4K Write 8.8 4K Mixed 11.7 43% 12 MB/s	DQ Read 21.4 DQ Write 12.4 DQ Mixed 14.5 11% 16.1 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 21.8% Great: 61%
Generic Flash Disk 8GB 32,093 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 7GB free, PID 6387 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.1 4.2 4.2 4.4 4.4 4.1 MB/s Performing as expected (56^th percentile)	4.29% Terrible	Read 17.4 Write 4.5 Mixed 2.5 SusWrite 4.2 7% 7.15 MB/s	4K Read 3.6 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 13% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 4.29% Great: 7%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 1x2GB 99,586 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 1 of 2 slots used 2GB SODIMM DDR2 Performing below potential (3^rd percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	8.92% Terrible	MC Read 3.2 MC Write 2.8 MC Mixed 2.1 8% 2.7 GB/s	SC Read 2.1 SC Write 2.8 SC Mixed 2.6 7% 2.5 GB/s	Latency 182 22% 182 ns
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 8.92% Great: 26%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16