PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
Graphics | 52.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 90.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asrock B85M-DGS (all builds) |
Memory | 8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20140703 |
Uptime | 17.1 Days |
Run Date | Aug 01 '20 at 16:44 |
Run Duration | 124 Seconds |
Run User | DEU-User |
Background CPU | 23% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
71.1%
Very good
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 451.48
Performing below potential (14th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
52.4%
Above average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
96GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 259 287 274 279 279 288 MB/s
|
90.3%
Outstanding
|
|||
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$33
118GB free
Firmware: MS2OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 96 98 100 99 99 MB/s
|
65.4%
Good
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Kingston HyperX DDR3 2133 C11 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (20th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
48.9%
Average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5-4460Intel $194Bench 62%, 245,403 samples | 77x |
Core i7-4790Intel $135Bench 71%, 255,027 samples | 39x |
Core i7-4770Intel $75Bench 70%, 176,321 samples | 18x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples | 24x |
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples | 19x |
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 16x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 52% - Above average | Total price: $420 |