Asus TUF Gaming FA506II_FA506II

Performance Results

Gaming 16%
Desktop 73%
Workstation 16%
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics6.84% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive174% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Run History
SystemAsus TUF Gaming FA506II_FA506II  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK FA506II
Memory10.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200324
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 01 '20 at 16:17
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User VNM-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
FP6, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 2.55 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
79.4% Very good
Memory 82
1-Core 82
2-Core 183
68% 116 Pts
4-Core 414
8-Core 649
68% 531 Pts
64-Core 852
57% 852 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 79.4%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
AMD Radeon Graphics
Asus(1043 16DF) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver:
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
6.84% Terrible
Lighting 7.9
Reflection 11.5
Parallax 10.3
7% 9.93 fps
MRender 13
Gravity 10.6
Splatting 17.6
8% 13.7 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 6.84%
Great: 20%
Drive Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AB 512GB
375GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ECFK52.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 882 907 914 916 911 918 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
174% Outstanding
Read 946
Write 913
Mixed 844
SusWrite 908
204% 903 MB/s
4K Read 34.7
4K Write 132
4K Mixed 52.9
190% 73.2 MB/s
DQ Read 294
DQ Write 716
DQ Mixed 398
334% 470 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 174%
Great: 200%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Kingston 9905700-053.A00G Micron 8ATF1G64HZ-3G2J1 16GB
3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
104% Outstanding
MC Read 42.6
MC Write 42.2
MC Mixed 35.3
114% 40 GB/s
SC Read 10.8
SC Write 32.6
SC Mixed 22.2
62% 21.9 GB/s
Latency 76.9
52% 76.9 ns
Poor: 79%
This bench: 104%
Great: 107%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical TUF Gaming FA506II_FA506II Builds (Compare 1,314 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming 16%
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation 16%

System: Asus TUF Gaming FA506II_FA506II

The Best.
Intel Core i5-9600K $190Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Crucial MX500 250GB $34
Intel Core i5-9400F $150Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i5-10600K $260Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $190Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $50
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $43Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $64SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $71SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback