Razer Blade

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics6.78% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive53.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 23 months ago.
SystemRazer Blade  (all builds)
MotherboardRazer DANA_MB
Memory8.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180831
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 01 '20 at 16:17
Run Duration152 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
74.2% Very good
Memory 90.5
1-Core 120
2-Core 161
76% 124 Pts
4-Core 314
8-Core 459
48% 386 Pts
64-Core 572
35% 572 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 74.2%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Device(1A58 2001) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8280
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
6.78% Terrible
Lighting 6.93
Reflection 57.4
Parallax 7.41
6% 23.9 fps
MRender 11.3
Gravity 6.37
Splatting 14
9% 10.6 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 6.78%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Liteon CV6-8Q128 128GB
25GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2871302
SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 4.8 0 0 31 105 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
53.4% Above average
Read 472
Write 108
Mixed 150
SusWrite 41.1
42% 193 MB/s
4K Read 21.9
4K Write 34.6
4K Mixed 23
81% 26.5 MB/s
DQ Read 236
DQ Write 78.1
DQ Mixed 124
100% 146 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 53.4%
Great: 85%
Seagate ST1000LM048-2E7172 1TB
738GB free
Firmware: SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 94 120 120 119 114 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
43.2% Average
Read 35.5
Write 85.5
Mixed 68.7
SusWrite 114
56% 75.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 3.8
4K Mixed 0.7
186% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 43.2%
Great: 71%
WD easystore 25FC 1TB
338GB free, PID 25fc
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 62 79 79 79 75 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
34.2% Below average
Read 83
Write 80.8
Mixed 52
SusWrite 75.6
98% 72.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.9
94% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 34.2%
Great: 60%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CTD 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing below potential (16th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
69.2% Good
MC Read 27.3
MC Write 24.9
MC Mixed 20
69% 24.1 GB/s
SC Read 16.4
SC Write 25.9
SC Mixed 23.3
62% 21.9 GB/s
Latency 66.5
60% 66.5 ns
Poor: 57%
This bench: 69.2%
Great: 84%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Blade Builds (Compare 4,027 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: Razer Blade

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback