Razer Blade

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics8.19% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive53.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemRazer Blade  (all builds)
MotherboardRazer DANA_MB
Memory8.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180831
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 01 '20 at 16:17
Run Duration152 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Core i7-8750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
73.9% Very good
Memory 90.5
1-Core 117
2-Core 149
75% 119 Pts
4-Core 312
8-Core 439
49% 376 Pts
64-Core 544
36% 544 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 73.9%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Device(1A58 2001) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8280
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
8.19% Terrible
Lighting 6.93
Reflection 57.4
Parallax 7.41
8% 23.9 fps
MRender 11.3
Gravity 6.37
Splatting 14
7% 10.6 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 8.19%
Great: 10%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Liteon CV6-8Q128 128GB
25GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2871302
SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 4.8 0 0 31 105 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
53.4% Above average
Read 472
Write 108
Mixed 150
SusWrite 41.1
42% 193 MB/s
4K Read 21.9
4K Write 34.6
4K Mixed 23
81% 26.5 MB/s
DQ Read 236
DQ Write 78.1
DQ Mixed 124
100% 146 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 53.4%
Great: 85%
Seagate ST1000LM048-2E7172 1TB
738GB free
Firmware: SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 94 120 120 119 114 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
43.2% Average
Read 35.5
Write 85.5
Mixed 68.7
SusWrite 114
56% 75.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 3.8
4K Mixed 0.7
186% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 43.2%
Great: 72%
WD easystore 25FC 1TB
338GB free, PID 25fc
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 62 79 79 79 75 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
34.2% Below average
Read 83
Write 80.8
Mixed 52
SusWrite 75.6
98% 72.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.9
94% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 34.2%
Great: 61%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CTD 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
69.2% Good
MC Read 27.3
MC Write 24.9
MC Mixed 20
69% 24.1 GB/s
SC Read 16.4
SC Write 25.9
SC Mixed 23.3
62% 21.9 GB/s
Latency 66.5
60% 66.5 ns
Poor: 55%
This bench: 69.2%
Great: 84%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical Blade Builds (Compare 3,938 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

System: Razer Blade

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9600K $190Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Crucial MX500 250GB $34
Intel Core i5-9400F $150Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i5-10600K $260Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $190Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $43Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $64SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $71SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback