Asus Z87-C

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 54%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 44%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics53.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive108% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus Z87-C  (all builds)
Memory28.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140815
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 01 '20 at 16:00
Run Duration137 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4670K-$62
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
91.7% Outstanding
Memory 96.6
1-Core 127
2-Core 253
90% 159 Pts
4-Core 501
8-Core 505
67% 503 Pts
64-Core 504
31% 504 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 91.7%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
CLim: 1419 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.5.1
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
53.5% Above average
Lighting 66
Reflection 71.8
Parallax 82.7
54% 73.5 fps
MRender 72.7
Gravity 64.5
Splatting 59.7
53% 65.6 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 53.5%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
307GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 380 380 380 368 372 384 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
108% Outstanding
Read 506
Write 382
Mixed 316
SusWrite 377
89% 395 MB/s
4K Read 27.5
4K Write 131
4K Mixed 38.9
161% 65.7 MB/s
DQ Read 382
DQ Write 349
DQ Mixed 268
228% 333 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 108%
Great: 129%
Seagate ST3000NM0005-1V410N 3TB
1TB free
Firmware: TN05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 145 145 144 148 147 147 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
85.9% Excellent
Read 152
Write 147
Mixed 89
SusWrite 146
98% 134 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 4.1
4K Mixed 1.1
256% 2.2 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 85.9%
Great: 113%
Seagate ST3000NM0005-1V410N 3TB
2TB free
Firmware: TN05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 141 143 141 145 146 146 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
84.6% Excellent
Read 150
Write 149
Mixed 93.5
SusWrite 144
99% 134 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 3.8
4K Mixed 1.2
262% 2.13 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 84.6%
Great: 113%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 2400 C11 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 2400 MHz clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (73rd percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
81.6% Excellent
MC Read 28.9
MC Write 30.9
MC Mixed 26.6
82% 28.8 GB/s
SC Read 19.9
SC Write 23
SC Mixed 25.6
65% 22.8 GB/s
Latency 51.7
77% 51.7 ns
Poor: 44%
This bench: 81.6%
Great: 109%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z87-C Builds (Compare 781 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 44%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 37%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus Z87-C - $120

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 84% - Excellent Total price: $437
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $132Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback