Asus MAXIMUS IX EXTREME

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (92nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 8 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 100%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics	85.9% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus MAXIMUS IX EXTREME (all builds)
Memory	24.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180314
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Aug 01 '20 at 15:35
Run Duration	156 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	13%

Watch Gameplay: Vega-56 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-7700K-$241 712,312 User benchmarks, average bench 84% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	100% Outstanding	Memory 95.4 1-Core 143 2-Core 286 97% 175 Pts	4-Core 572 8-Core 798 86% 685 Pts	64-Core 796 49% 796 Pts
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 100% Great: 92%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX Vega-56-$170 92,053 User benchmarks, average bench 78% Sapphire(1DA2 E376) CLim: 1590 MHz, MLim: 800 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.2.2 Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	85.9% Excellent	Lighting 102 Reflection 89.3 Parallax 147 83% 113 fps	MRender 87.3 Gravity 110 Splatting 126 91% 108 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 85.9% Great: 85%

Drives	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SanDisk Extreme Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB (2018) 4,979 User benchmarks, average bench 244% 101GB free (System drive) Firmware: 101110RL Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 1,931 Write 1,881 Mixed 1,589 402% 1,800 MB/s	4K Read 41.5 4K Write 101 4K Mixed 57.3 190% 66.6 MB/s	DQ Read 939 DQ Write 657 DQ Mixed 832 612% 810 MB/s
Poor: 172% Great: 292%
Crucial MX500 1TB-$66 202,785 User benchmarks, average bench 106% 136GB free Firmware: M3CR023 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 464 Write 360 Mixed 398 91% 408 MB/s	4K Read 35 4K Write 84.4 4K Mixed 49 160% 56.1 MB/s	DQ Read 387 DQ Write 341 DQ Mixed 297 241% 342 MB/s
Poor: 75% Great: 125%
Toshiba X300 5TB-$125 12,743 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 671GB free Firmware: FP2A Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 122 Write 72.5 Mixed 51 60% 81.8 MB/s	4K Read 1.8 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 1.1 234% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 63% Great: 109%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GB 11,284 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 2 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	103% Outstanding	MC Read 38.7 MC Write 40.2 MC Mixed 30.9 105% 36.6 GB/s	SC Read 22 SC Write 43.4 SC Mixed 30.1 91% 31.8 GB/s	Latency 56 71% 56 ns
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 103% Great: 118%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical MAXIMUS IX EXTREME Builds (Compare 374 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 106%

UFO

Desktop 90%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 90%

Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS IX EXTREME

CPU
Core i7-7700KIntel $241Bench 84%, 712,312 samples	200x
Core i7-6700KIntel $180Bench 81%, 588,978 samples	53x
Core i7-7700Intel $167Bench 76%, 256,717 samples	27x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	54x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	34x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	27x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	21x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	11x
860 Evo 250GBSamsung $52Bench 104%, 296,814 samples	11x

RAM
Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBG.SKILL $113Bench 91%, 87,239 samples	15x
Trident Z RGB DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $55Bench 84%, 215,644 samples	10x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBCorsairBench 93%, 89,024 samples	8x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 73% - Very good

Total price: $919

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16