| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 39.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor. |
| Graphics | 2.57% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 102% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Very high background CPU (31%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Asrock J4105M (all builds) |
| Memory | 4.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
| Display | Χρώματα 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20180504 |
| Uptime | 2.1 Days |
| Run Date | Jul 31 '20 at 21:42 |
| Run Duration | 127 Seconds |
| Run User | GRC-User |
| Background CPU | 31% |
PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Celeron J4105
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.5 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
|
39.6%
Below average
|
38% 66.9 Pts
|
28% 206 Pts
|
13% 206 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Intel UHD Graphics 600
ASRock(1849 2212) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7262
|
2.57%
Terrible
|
2% 2.73 fps
|
4% 4.42 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
180GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 379 293 302 302 300 300 MB/s
|
102%
Outstanding
|
90% 401 MB/s
|
156% 51.6 MB/s
|
260% 350 MB/s
|
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown 2400 C15 Series 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
26.4%
Poor
|
29% 10.2 GB/s
|
11% 3.83 GB/s
|
21% 187 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical J4105M Builds (Compare 22 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asrock J4105M
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| UHD Graphics 600IntelBench 1%, 35,976 samples | 14x |
| GTX 1050Nvidia $101Bench 26%, 269,381 samples | 2x |
| GTX 650Nvidia $112Bench 8%, 69,673 samples | 1x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 23% - Poor | Total price: $30 |