Asus M5A99FX PRO R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 57%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 48%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics85.9% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive73.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus M5A99FX PRO R2.0  (all builds)
Memory3.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140407
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 31 '20 at 15:53
Run Duration138 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 18%
Watch Gameplay: 5700 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
AMD FX-8350-$130
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
67.3% Good
Memory 89.5
1-Core 59.5
2-Core 144
61% 97.8 Pts
4-Core 244
8-Core 486
45% 365 Pts
64-Core 462
31% 462 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 67.3%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
AMD RX 5700-$340
Ram: 8GB, Driver: 19.7.1
Performing below potential (33rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
85.9% Excellent
Lighting 291
Reflection 250
Parallax 648
76% 396 fps
MRender 203
Gravity 323
Splatting 305
87% 277 fps
Poor: 82%
This bench: 85.9%
Great: 98%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$85
53GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 197 144 147 144 146 142 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
73.6% Very good
Read 356
Write 302
Mixed 279
SusWrite 153
61% 273 MB/s
4K Read 32.8
4K Write 52.3
4K Mixed 38.4
127% 41.2 MB/s
DQ Read 270
DQ Write 200
DQ Mixed 222
170% 231 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 73.6%
Great: 123%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$40
292GB free
Firmware: CC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 206 213 213 213 213 214 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
122% Outstanding
Read 212
Write 140
Mixed 91.5
SusWrite 212
120% 164 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.8
159% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 122%
Great: 115%
SRT USB 64GB
60GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 18 16 18 16 17 MB/s
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
11.7% Very poor
Read 30
Write 27.3
Mixed 11
SusWrite 16.9
27% 21.3 MB/s
4K Read 2.5
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 1.4
91% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 11.7%
Great: 37%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
HyperX Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1866 MHz clocked @ 933 MHz
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
33.7% Below average
MC Read 12.5
MC Write 11.2
MC Mixed 9.5
32% 11.1 GB/s
SC Read 10.6
SC Write 7.2
SC Mixed 9.6
26% 9.13 GB/s
Latency 67.8
59% 67.8 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 33.7%
Great: 72%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical M5A99FX PRO R2.0 Builds (Compare 2,660 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 33%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus M5A99FX PRO R2.0 - $208

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 38% - Below average Total price: $851
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9600K $180Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $230Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i7-9700K $300Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $170Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i5-9400F $145Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super) $500Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $43
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $43Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $66SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $64SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Extreme 16GB $28
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback