GPD MicroPC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 36%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 37.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics2.15% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive64.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemGPD MicroPC  (all builds)
MotherboardGPD MicroPC
Memory3.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191213
Uptime11.4 Days
Run DateJul 31 '20 at 11:32
Run Duration117 Seconds
Run User HKG-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron N4100
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
37.5% Below average
Memory 41.2
1-Core 46.7
2-Core 100
36% 62.7 Pts
4-Core 195
8-Core 197
26% 196 Pts
64-Core 191
12% 191 Pts
Poor: 20%
This bench: 37.5%
Great: 41%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 600
Device(0000 0000) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8336
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
2.15% Terrible
Lighting 2.2
Reflection 2.42
Parallax 2.28
2% 2.3 fps
MRender 3.43
Gravity 2.23
Splatting 4.39
3% 3.35 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 2.15%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
LS 256G M300 256GB
156GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S1211A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 320 311 327 338 338 330 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
64.6% Good
Read 375
Write 327
Mixed 319
SusWrite 327
76% 337 MB/s
4K Read 16.4
4K Write 60.6
4K Mixed 11.4
72% 29.5 MB/s
DQ Read 122
DQ Write 276
DQ Mixed 30.3
71% 143 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 64.6%
Great: 78%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
ABCD 123456789012345678 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM LPDDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
24.2% Poor
MC Read 8.4
MC Write 10
MC Mixed 9.8
27% 9.4 GB/s
SC Read 2.6
SC Write 3.8
SC Mixed 3.4
9% 3.27 GB/s
Latency 197
20% 197 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 24.2%
Great: 29%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MicroPC Builds (Compare 23 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 33%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: GPD MicroPC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback