Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 12.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Packard EasyNote TE69KB (all builds)
Motherboard	Packard EasyNote TE69KB
Memory	1.7 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit kleuren
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20130503
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jul 30 '20 at 22:52
Run Duration	135 Seconds
Run User	NLD-User
Background CPU	100%

PC Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD E1-2500 APU 2,593 User benchmarks, average bench 21% Socket FT1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.4 GHz, turbo 1.4 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	12.2% Very poor	Memory 19.3 1-Core 10.2 2-Core 21.1 11% 16.9 Pts	4-Core 28.7 8-Core 38.9 4% 33.8 Pts	64-Core 28.7 2% 28.7 Pts
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 12.2% Great: 30%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD Blue 2.5" 320GB (2010)-$18 39,749 User benchmarks, average bench 33% 286GB free (System drive) Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 65 65 63 48 43 72 MB/s Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	45% Average	Read 97.3 Write 62 Mixed 33.7 SusWrite 59.4 46% 63.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.5 90% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 45% Great: 47%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 8KTF51264HZ-1G6E1 1x4GB 14,353 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 1 of 2 slots used 4GB SODIMM DDR3 800 MHz clocked @ 667 MHz Performing below potential (4^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	9.42% Terrible	MC Read 3.4 MC Write 2.1 MC Mixed 4.1 9% 3.2 GB/s	SC Read 2.5 SC Write 1.8 SC Mixed 3.8 8% 2.7 GB/s	Latency 326 12% 326 ns
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 9.42% Great: 32%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 23%

Surfboard

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	3x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	1x
MZ7PD128HAFV-000 128GBSamsungBench 81%, 1,744 samples	1x

RAM
8KTF51264HZ-1G6E1 1x4GBMicronBench 25%, 14,353 samples	6x
ACR16D3LS1KBG/4G 1x4GBKingstonBench 26%, 671 samples	4x
HMT451S6MFR8A-PB 1x4GBHynixBench 27%, 3,182 samples	3x

Value: 21% - Poor

Total price: $28

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16