Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (3rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 97 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 36.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot Drive	66.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	HP Pavilion Gaming Laptop 15-dk0xxx (all builds)
Motherboard	HP 85FC
Memory	23.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200702
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jul 30 '20 at 19:38
Run Duration	118 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	15%

PC Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-9750H 328,182 User benchmarks, average bench 73% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 0.8 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	36.7% Below average	Memory 59.5 1-Core 24.4 2-Core 40.4 30% 41.4 Pts	4-Core 77.8 8-Core 139 13% 109 Pts	64-Core 188 12% 188 Pts
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 36.7% Great: 87%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WDC WDS100T2B0B-00YS70 1TB 39,874 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 319GB free (System drive) Firmware: 401020WD SusWrite @10s intervals: 366 356 369 372 368 351 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	66.9% Good	Read 408 Write 384 Mixed 345 SusWrite 364 84% 375 MB/s	4K Read 18.7 4K Write 27.5 4K Mixed 21.3 70% 22.5 MB/s	DQ Read 149 DQ Write 143 DQ Mixed 150 111% 147 MB/s
Poor: 69% ↑ This bench: 66.9% Great: 115%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial CT16G4SFD824A.M16FE 2x16GB 1,062 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 2 of 2 slots used 32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	39.2% Below average	MC Read 17.3 MC Write 11.1 MC Mixed 16.3 43% 14.9 GB/s	SC Read 5.3 SC Write 8.9 SC Mixed 6.8 20% 7 GB/s	Latency 129 31% 129 ns
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 39.2% Great: 93%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 64%

Destroyer

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

GPU
UHD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 506,702 samples	2,608x
GTX 1650 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 41%, 92,838 samples	1,504x
GeForce GTX 1050NvidiaBench 26%, 16,200 samples	497x

SSD
KIOXIA 256GBKbg30zmv256gBench 113%, 8,196 samples	424x
MZVLB256HAHQ-000H1 256GBSamsungBench 174%, 20,171 samples	414x
TOSHIBA 256GBKbg30zmv256gBench 99%, 31,797 samples	278x

RAM
M471A1K43CB1-CTD 1x8GBSamsungBench 40%, 96,646 samples	717x
M471A1K43CB1-CTD 2x8GBSamsungBench 76%, 108,106 samples	431x
M471A1K43DB1-CTD 1x8GBSamsungBench 40%, 54,121 samples	399x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16