Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results


Gaming 97% Nuclear submarine	Desktop 92% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 99% Nuclear submarine


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	114% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	236% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) (all builds)
Memory	15.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20191108
Uptime	4.1 Days
Run Date	Jul 30 '20 at 01:03
Run Duration	263 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	18%

PC Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$205 635,419 User benchmarks, average bench 86% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (40^th percentile)	83.6% Excellent	Memory 74.1 1-Core 146 2-Core 287 90% 169 Pts	4-Core 499 8-Core 902 84% 700 Pts	64-Core 1,337 83% 1,337 Pts
Poor: 76% ↑ This bench: 83.6% Great: 94%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485 840,268 User benchmarks, average bench 124% Asus(1043 85F1) CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 445.75 Performing below potential (14^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	114% Outstanding	Lighting 151 Reflection 177 Parallax 179 123% 169 fps	MRender 116 Gravity 164 Splatting 115 106% 132 fps
Poor: 109% ↑ This bench: 114% Great: 133%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43 381,216 User benchmarks, average bench 273% 321GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 812 575 590 602 604 603 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	236% Outstanding	Read 2306 Write 2088 Mixed 1,520 SusWrite 631 365% 1,636 MB/s	4K Read 55 4K Write 88.9 4K Mixed 65.5 214% 69.8 MB/s	DQ Read 1,122 DQ Write 596 DQ Mixed 816 618% 845 MB/s
Poor: 199% ↑ This bench: 236% Great: 340%
Crucial MX500 2TB-$146 44,787 User benchmarks, average bench 108% 36GB free Firmware: M3CR023 SusWrite @10s intervals: 328 331 409 416 420 423 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	87.4% Excellent	Read 347 Write 17.3 Mixed 381 SusWrite 388 64% 283 MB/s	4K Read 30.2 4K Write 60.2 4K Mixed 40.4 129% 43.6 MB/s	DQ Read 231 DQ Write 183 DQ Mixed 183 143% 199 MB/s
Poor: 83% ↑ This bench: 87.4% Great: 125%
Corsair Neutron GTX 120GB-$79 2,261 User benchmarks, average bench 78% 54GB free Firmware: M311 SusWrite @10s intervals: 253 208 196 191 202 188 MB/s Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	71.7% Very good	Read 485 Write 313 Mixed 192 SusWrite 206 66% 299 MB/s	4K Read 24.4 4K Write 56.8 4K Mixed 26.1 100% 35.8 MB/s	DQ Read 223 DQ Write 183 DQ Mixed 197 149% 201 MB/s
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 71.7% Great: 95%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50 815,515 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 845GB free Firmware: CC27 SusWrite @10s intervals: 160 166 165 166 166 167 MB/s Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	96% Outstanding	Read 170 Write 114 Mixed 87.5 SusWrite 165 98% 134 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.8 150% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 96% Great: 114%
Seagate IronWolf 6TB (2017)-$121 553 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 157GB free Firmware: SC60 SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 107 107 107 107 106 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 56% Great: 110%
Seagate Barracuda 6TB (2017)-$87 14,331 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 2.5TB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 136 152 158 158 158 154 MB/s Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	75.2% Very good	Read 107 Write 134 Mixed 113 SusWrite 153 94% 127 MB/s	4K Read 6.8 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.3 357% 3.1 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 75.2% Great: 87%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial BLS16G4D32AESC.M16FE 2x16GB 2,856 User benchmarks, average bench 94% 2 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below potential (6^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	69.7% Good	MC Read 28.9 MC Write 17.8 MC Mixed 28 71% 24.9 GB/s	SC Read 20 SC Write 17.6 SC Mixed 27.4 62% 21.7 GB/s	Latency 92.3 43% 92.3 ns
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 69.7% Great: 119%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 25,796 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 129%

UFO

Desktop 94%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 130%

UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) - $192

CPU
Ryzen 7 3700XAMD $205Bench 86%, 635,419 samples	4,640x
Ryzen 7 5800XAMD $185Bench 98%, 128,080 samples	4,263x
Ryzen 5 5600XAMD $153Bench 96%, 383,420 samples	3,409x

GPU
RTX 3070Nvidia $400Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	2,234x
RTX 3080Nvidia $910Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	2,072x
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	1,466x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $92Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	1,834x
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $98Bench 394%, 276,089 samples	1,105x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $158Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	865x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	770x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $56Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	724x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBCorsair $114Bench 89%, 144,399 samples	646x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 98% - Outstanding

Total price: $929

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16