ADD TO PC
BUILD

Lenovo 4157AW9

Performance Results


Gaming 14% Tree trunk	Desktop 69% Battle cruiser	Workstation 11% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	15.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	66.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Lenovo 4157AW9 (all builds)
Motherboard	LENOVO LENOVO
Memory	5.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20090917
Uptime	3.6 Days
Run Date	Jul 29 '20 at 19:38
Run Duration	162 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5530 662 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 1366-pin LGA, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	66% Good	Memory 92.5 1-Core 67 2-Core 126 60% 95.1 Pts	4-Core 216 8-Core 318 33% 267 Pts	64-Core 320 20% 320 Pts
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 66% Great: 67%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GT 1030 185,384 User benchmarks, average bench 14% MSI(1462 8C98) 2GB CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 451.67 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	15.7% Very poor	Lighting 19.5 Reflection 15.5 Parallax 18.2 16% 17.7 fps	MRender 16 Gravity 19.2 Splatting 20.6 15% 18.6 fps
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 15.7% Great: 15%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80 762,998 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 396GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT03B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 215 228 230 231 232 229 MB/s Performing below potential (3^rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	66.8% Good	Read 243 Write 234 Mixed 230 SusWrite 227 53% 234 MB/s	4K Read 25.1 4K Write 47.8 4K Mixed 35.6 109% 36.2 MB/s	DQ Read 202 DQ Write 191 DQ Mixed 197 148% 197 MB/s
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 66.8% Great: 129%
Sandisk PLUS 240GB 86,316 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 87GB free Firmware: UF4500RL SusWrite @10s intervals: 197 61 67 76 78 146 MB/s Performing below potential (11^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	35.1% Below average	Read 222 Write 191 Mixed 186 SusWrite 104 39% 176 MB/s	4K Read 13.9 4K Write 23.7 4K Mixed 13.6 51% 17.1 MB/s	DQ Read 112 DQ Write 79.3 DQ Mixed 40.4 45% 77.3 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 35.1% Great: 56%
WD WD5000AAVS-00ZTB0 500GB 13,629 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 286GB free Firmware: 01.00A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 86 83 85 86 85 MB/s Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	45.2% Average	Read 72.5 Write 74.3 Mixed 50.3 SusWrite 84.5 52% 70.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.7 139% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 45.2% Great: 44%
Lexar JumpDrive S73 USB 3.0 8GB-$9 217 User benchmarks, average bench 9% 5GB free, PID a205 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 13 13 13 13 13 MB/s Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	8.56% Terrible	Read 30.8 Write 12.9 Mixed 16.3 SusWrite 12.5 22% 18.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 0.4 4K Mixed 0.3 26% 0.43 MB/s
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 8.56% Great: 12%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4x2GB 183,252 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 4 of 6 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 133 MHz Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	37.5% Below average	MC Read 13.8 MC Write 12 MC Mixed 11.4 35% 12.4 GB/s	SC Read 10.1 SC Write 9.4 SC Mixed 11 29% 10.2 GB/s	Latency 63.1 63% 63.1 ns
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 37.5% Great: 45%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

The Best.

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $15	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback