Asrock A320M-HDV R3.0

Performance Results


Gaming 19% Surfboard	Desktop 72% Battleship	Workstation 18% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	16.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	30.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

4 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock A320M-HDV R3.0 (all builds)
Memory	13.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1280x1024x4294967296 szín
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20181108
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jul 29 '20 at 16:12
Run Duration	186 Seconds
Run User	HUN-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 1400-$87 71,313 User benchmarks, average bench 61% AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	66.2% Good	Memory 73 1-Core 103 2-Core 189 69% 121 Pts	4-Core 320 8-Core 536 52% 428 Pts	64-Core 534 33% 534 Pts
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 66.2% Great: 69%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GT 1030 185,384 User benchmarks, average bench 14% Gigabyte(1458 375C) 2GB CLim: 2138 MHz, MLim: 1617 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 451.67 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	16.9% Very poor	Lighting 21.1 Reflection 17 Parallax 19.2 17% 19.1 fps	MRender 17.6 Gravity 20.7 Splatting 20.5 16% 19.6 fps
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 16.9% Great: 15%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$30 166,392 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 16GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFKB1E1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 20 107 76 19 67 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	30.8% Below average	Read 321 Write 86.1 Mixed 82.8 SusWrite 63.6 30% 138 MB/s	4K Read 13.3 4K Write 19.3 4K Mixed 10.7 44% 14.4 MB/s	DQ Read 14.6 DQ Write 15.6 DQ Mixed 14.6 11% 14.9 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 30.8% Great: 85%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 999GB 64,984 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 235GB free Firmware: 0.1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 174 177 178 155 153 166 MB/s Performing as expected (49^th percentile)	87.5% Excellent	Read 138 Write 152 Mixed 80.1 SusWrite 167 98% 134 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.6 128% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 87.5% Great: 110%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 8GB-$7 16,591 User benchmarks, average bench 12% 3GB free, PID 1666 Operating at USB 3.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.7 5.4 6 4.9 4.7 5.7 MB/s Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	22.5% Poor	Read 129 Write 4.3 Mixed 4.2 SusWrite 5.4 27% 35.7 MB/s	4K Read 11.2 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 42% 3.73 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 22.5% Great: 22%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingmax GLLG42F-18---------- 2x8GB 270 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 1200 MHz Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	87.1% Excellent	MC Read 34 MC Write 32 MC Mixed 29.5 91% 31.8 GB/s	SC Read 20.4 SC Write 31.9 SC Mixed 24.4 73% 25.6 GB/s	Latency 94.6 42% 94.6 ns
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 87.1% Great: 93%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical A320M-HDV R3.0 Builds (Compare 329 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 26%

Raft

Desktop 71%

Battleship

Workstation 22%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock A320M-HDV R3.0

CPU
Ryzen 3 2200GAMD $104Bench 60%, 181,631 samples	79x
Ryzen 5 2600AMD $155Bench 73%, 179,588 samples	57x
Ryzen 3 1200AMD $100Bench 57%, 83,528 samples	23x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	38x
RX Vega 8 (Ryzen iGPU)AMDBench 10%, 85,536 samples	25x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	21x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	15x
A400 120GBKingston $30Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	9x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	8x

RAM
KF3200C16D4/8GX 2x8GBKingstonBench 88%, 58,684 samples	9x
Aegis DDR4 3000 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $36Bench 82%, 163,634 samples	8x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	7x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 83% - Excellent

Total price: $191

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16