Dell Precision T3600

Performance Results


Gaming 32% Sail boat	Desktop 72% Battleship	Workstation 28% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	38.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	63.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (70%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	Dell Precision T3600
Motherboard	Dell Precision T3600 (all builds)
Memory	9.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit farger
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190625
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Jul 29 '20 at 13:52
Run Duration	126 Seconds
Run User	NOR-User
Background CPU	70%

Watch Gameplay: 1660-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (40^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-1620 0-$345 17,464 User benchmarks, average bench 70% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	64.3% Good	Memory 80.7 1-Core 78 2-Core 151 62% 103 Pts	4-Core 259 8-Core 427 42% 343 Pts	64-Core 464 29% 464 Pts
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 64.3% Great: 77%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti-$143 318,562 User benchmarks, average bench 76% Zotac(19DA 3527) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 451.67 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	38.5% Below average	Lighting 49.3 Reflection 45.3 Parallax 40.8 40% 45.2 fps	MRender 51.9 Gravity 41.7 Splatting 37.7 35% 43.7 fps
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 38.5% Great: 81%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Liteon CV3-CE256 256GB 1,018 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 124GB free (System drive) Firmware: 10B SusWrite @10s intervals: 171 167 169 196 196 197 MB/s Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	63.3% Good	Read 312 Write 177 Mixed 273 SusWrite 183 53% 236 MB/s	4K Read 23.6 4K Write 47.3 4K Mixed 24.5 92% 31.8 MB/s	DQ Read 296 DQ Write 218 DQ Mixed 280 203% 265 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 63.3% Great: 96%
WD WD1002FBYS-02A6B0 1TB 28,278 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 627GB free Firmware: 0C06 SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 102 101 102 101 102 MB/s Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	58.4% Above average	Read 103 Write 101 Mixed 72.4 SusWrite 100 69% 94.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 1 189% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 58.4% Great: 62%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung-00CE M378B5273CH0-CK0 M378B5273DH0-CK0 M378B5273CH0-CK0 M378B5273CH0-CK0 16GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	84.1% Excellent	MC Read 30.6 MC Write 37.3 MC Mixed 31.8 95% 33.2 GB/s	SC Read 12.3 SC Write 12 SC Mixed 10.4 33% 11.6 GB/s	Latency 79.2 50% 79.2 ns
Poor: 84% ↑ This bench: 84.1% Great: 92%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Precision T3600 Builds (Compare 2,847 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 13%

Tree trunk

Desktop 67%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 12%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Dell Precision T3600

CPU
Xeon E5-1620 0Intel $345Bench 70%, 17,464 samples	1,061x
Xeon E5-1650 0Intel $230Bench 73%, 10,189 samples	444x
Xeon E5-1603 0IntelBench 60%, 3,589 samples	237x

GPU
Quadro 2000NvidiaBench 6%, 15,855 samples	162x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	137x
Quadro 4000NvidiaBench 7%, 8,609 samples	117x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	83x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	62x
870 EVO 1TBSamsung $89Bench 112%, 129,044 samples	48x

RAM
M393B5273DH0-CK0 4x4GBSamsung-00CEBench 85%, 1,049 samples	147x
HMT351R7CFR8C-PB 4x4GBHynix-00ADBench 83%, 808 samples	130x
M393B1K70DH0-CK0 4x8GBSamsung-00CEBench 79%, 545 samples	73x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 62% - Good

Total price: $373

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16