Gigabyte GA-AB350M-Gaming 3-CF

Performance Results


Gaming 65% Battle cruiser	Desktop 83% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 61% Destroyer


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	78.6% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	Gigabyte AB350M-Gaming 3
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-AB350M-Gaming 3-CF (all builds)
Memory	4.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180315
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jul 29 '20 at 09:23
Run Duration	217 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	4%

Watch Gameplay: Vega-56 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 1600-$110 392,253 User benchmarks, average bench 70% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	75.4% Very good	Memory 75.1 1-Core 104 2-Core 208 72% 129 Pts	4-Core 407 8-Core 676 66% 542 Pts	64-Core 853 53% 853 Pts
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 75.4% Great: 78%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX Vega-56-$170 92,053 User benchmarks, average bench 78% XFX(1682 9C30) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1590 MHz, MLim: 800 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.4.2 Performing below potential (68^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	78.6% Very good	Lighting 92.9 Reflection 85.2 Parallax 142 76% 107 fps	MRender 84.1 Gravity 97.6 Splatting 120 84% 100 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 78.6% Great: 85%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
PNY CS900 120GB-$25 42,924 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 9GB free (System drive) Firmware: CS900612 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 483 Write 199 Mixed 259 69% 314 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 17.7 4K Mixed 17.3 32% 11.8 MB/s	DQ Read 87.4 DQ Write 187 DQ Mixed 168 119% 147 MB/s
Poor: 42% Great: 87%
Sandisk PLUS 120 GB 120GB 14,313 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 30GB free Firmware: UE3600RL SusWrite @10s intervals: 134 67 43 36 24 35 MB/s Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	46.5% Average	Read 445 Write 289 Mixed 214 SusWrite 56.4 56% 251 MB/s	4K Read 22.1 4K Write 33.2 4K Mixed 15.7 71% 23.7 MB/s	DQ Read 117 DQ Write 58.5 DQ Mixed 22.8 34% 66 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 46.5% Great: 55%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$46 87,206 User benchmarks, average bench 234% 189GB free Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1485 402 404 404 404 405 MB/s Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	241% Outstanding	Read 2,419 Write 2,179 Mixed 1,523 SusWrite 584 374% 1,676 MB/s	4K Read 58.1 4K Write 120 4K Mixed 75.3 248% 84.6 MB/s	DQ Read 837 DQ Write 558 DQ Mixed 764 552% 720 MB/s
Poor: 152% ↑ This bench: 241% Great: 302%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown CL16-16-16 D4-2400 2x4GB 8,035 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	88.5% Excellent	MC Read 34.4 MC Write 32.8 MC Mixed 29.7 92% 32.3 GB/s	SC Read 21.2 SC Write 32.2 SC Mixed 24.9 75% 26.1 GB/s	Latency 90.1 44% 90.1 ns
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 88.5% Great: 88%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-AB350M-Gaming 3-CF Builds (Compare 1,266 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 46%

Yacht

Desktop 77%

Battleship

Workstation 42%

Speed boat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AB350M-Gaming 3-CF - $150

CPU
Ryzen 5 1600AMD $110Bench 70%, 392,253 samples	277x
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples	93x
Ryzen 5 1600XAMD $125Bench 74%, 140,440 samples	84x

GPU
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	122x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	82x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	82x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	40x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	34x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	27x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	57x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	49x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C16 2x8GBCorsairBench 75%, 46,470 samples	19x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 85% - Excellent

Total price: $521

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $15	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16