HP s5730f

Performance Results


Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 46% Yacht	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	0.48% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	39.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	HP s5730f (all builds)
Motherboard	FOXCONN 2AB7
Memory	3.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20100907
Uptime	6.9 Days
Run Date	Jul 29 '20 at 04:48
Run Duration	173 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	14%

PC Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Phenom II X2 511 210 User benchmarks, average bench 45% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	46.6% Average	Memory 77.6 1-Core 49.4 2-Core 97.5 48% 74.8 Pts	4-Core 94.4 8-Core 95.8 13% 95.1 Pts	64-Core 92.5 6% 92.5 Pts
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 46.6% Great: 49%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
ATI Radeon 3000 Graphics 21,841 User benchmarks, average bench 1% HP(103C 2AB7) 256MB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.970.100.9001 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	0.48% Terrible	Lighting 0.5 Reflection 1.46 Parallax 0.16 0% 0.71 fps	MRender 0.81 Gravity 0.37 Splatting 1.04 1% 0.74 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.48% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 240GB-$35 176,713 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 95GB free (System drive) Firmware: 505C SusWrite @10s intervals: 132 135 135 137 138 136 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	39.8% Below average	Read 158 Write 162 Mixed 168 SusWrite 136 35% 156 MB/s	4K Read 13.5 4K Write 31.8 4K Mixed 19.5 62% 21.6 MB/s	DQ Read 130 DQ Write 122 DQ Mixed 87.8 76% 113 MB/s
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 39.8% Great: 85%
Hitachi HDS721075CLA332 750GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 16% 381GB free, PID 2329 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 15 15 15 15 16 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	10.5% Very poor	Read 16.8 Write 22.4 Mixed 17.5 SusWrite 15.2 25% 18 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.7 77% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 10.5% Great: 19%
Generic- Multi-Card 127GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 7% 80GB free, PID 0118 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 14 16 15 15 17 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	8.34% Terrible	Read 17.8 Write 8.5 Mixed 15.6 SusWrite 14.8 19% 14.2 MB/s	4K Read 2.9 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 1.2 72% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 8.34% Great: 8%
Maxtor OneTouch II 300GB 134 User benchmarks, average bench 22% 34GB free, PID 7100 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 15 15 15 14 15 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	17.3% Very poor	Read 22.3 Write 21.3 Mixed 20.5 SusWrite 14.6 26% 19.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 3.5 4K Mixed 0.3 132% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 17.3% Great: 29%
HP External HDD 2TB 374 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 695GB free, PID 4607 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 30 33 31 34 34 33 MB/s Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)	18.8% Very poor	Read 29.2 Write 30.8 Mixed 25.2 SusWrite 32.4 40% 29.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 0.6 104% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 18.8% Great: 22%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4GBH2X02E99927-160 4GBH2X02E99927-160 8GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 32% 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	28.3% Poor	MC Read 11.3 MC Write 6.8 MC Mixed 10.1 27% 9.4 GB/s	SC Read 7.2 SC Write 6.7 SC Mixed 9 22% 7.63 GB/s	Latency 85.2 47% 85.2 ns
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 28.3% Great: 42%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16