Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (6th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 94 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot Drive	59.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	160GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 160GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

PC Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon X5690 2,873 User benchmarks, average bench 72% CPU0 PROCESSOR, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads Base clock 3.45 GHz Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	55.8% Above average	Memory 85.2 1-Core 42.4 2-Core 88.2 48% 71.9 Pts	4-Core 145 8-Core 357 28% 251 Pts	64-Core 903 56% 903 Pts
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 55.8% Great: 79%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Charger 250GB 98GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1.0. SusWrite @10s intervals: 214 75 60 51 44 188 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	59.6% Above average	Read 249 Write 59.2 Mixed 174 SusWrite 106 33% 147 MB/s	4K Read 25.5 4K Write 47.6 4K Mixed 33.8 107% 35.6 MB/s	DQ Read 244 DQ Write 183 DQ Mixed 200 153% 209 MB/s

Areca Charger_Keep 30TB 2.5TB free Firmware: R001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 514 483 491 428 462 461 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples

Areca Charger_Render 9TB 38GB free Firmware: R001 Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples		Read 1218 Write 1,554 Mixed 596 250% 1,122 MB/s	4K Read 88.2 4K Write 86 4K Mixed 57.1 252% 77.1 MB/s	DQ Read 412 DQ Write 396 DQ Mixed 216 214% 341 MB/s

Seagate ST8000VN004-2M2101 8TB 135 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 5TB free Firmware: SC60 SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 29 29 30 33 29 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	19.5% Very poor	Read 38.5 Write 23.8 Mixed 31.5 SusWrite 29.3 23% 30.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 0.8 4K Mixed 0.5 83% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 19.5% Great: 113%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown ID:80 CE M393B2G70AH0-YH9 ID:02 FE EBJ17RG4EAFD-DJ-F ID:80 CE M393B2G70AH0-YH9 ID:80 CE M393B2G70AH0-YH9 ID:80 CE M393B2G70AH0-YH9 ID:80 CE M393B2G70AH0-YH9 ID:80 CE M393B2G70AH0-YH9 ID:80 CE ... 194GB 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 34816 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	30.4% Below average	MC Read 11.9 MC Write 9.4 MC Mixed 11 31% 10.8 GB/s	SC Read 5.5 SC Write 2.1 SC Mixed 5 12% 4.2 GB/s	Latency 71.8 56% 71.8 ns

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 10%

Tree trunk

Desktop 60%

Destroyer

Workstation 10%

Tree trunk

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon X56501stBench 64%, 7,756 samples	318x
CPU: Intel Xeon X56751stBench 68%, 4,275 samples	188x
CPU: Intel Xeon X56701stBench 67%, 4,676 samples	179x

SSD
WDS100T2B0A-00SM50 1TBWDCBench 98%, 74,123 samples	38x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	34x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	34x

RAM
ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 58GBUnknownBench 50%, 261 samples	23x
ID:80 2C 36JSZF51272PZ1G4F1 ID:80 2C 36JSZF51272PZ1G4F1 ID:80 2C 36JSZF51272PZ1G4F1 ID:80 2C 36JSZF51272PZ1G4F1 ID:80 2C 36JSZF51272PZ1G4F1 ID:80 2C 36JSZF51272PZ1G4F1 ID:80 2C 36JSZF51272PZ1G4F1 JE... 82GBUnknownBench 53%, 67 samples	19x
ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD H... 130GBUnknownBench 53%, 67 samples	15x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16