HP Notebook

Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 29% Raft	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 19.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics	0.93% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	86.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 88% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.

System	HP Notebook (all builds)
Motherboard	HP 8131
Memory	8.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20150730
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Jul 28 '20 at 17:51
Run Duration	149 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	14%
CPU Throttled	88%

PC Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-6500U 102,213 User benchmarks, average bench 46% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	19.6% Very poor	Memory 6.84 1-Core 92.7 2-Core 172 43% 90.5 Pts	4-Core 173 8-Core 248 26% 211 Pts	64-Core 94.9 6% 94.9 Pts
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 19.6% Great: 57%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 520 (Mobile Skylake) 362,113 User benchmarks, average bench 4% HP(103C 8131) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7262 Relative performance (0^th percentile)	0.93% Terrible	Lighting 0.03 Reflection 9.08 Parallax 6.41 0% 5.17 fps	MRender 4.81 Gravity 6.2 Splatting 0.13 3% 3.71 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 0.93% Great: 5%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WDC WDBNCE2500PNC 250GB 1,666 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 111GB free (System drive) Firmware: 401120RL SusWrite @10s intervals: 173 218 214 216 205 175 MB/s Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	86.1% Excellent	Read 435 Write 266 Mixed 126 SusWrite 200 57% 257 MB/s	4K Read 34.8 4K Write 82.2 4K Mixed 32.2 138% 49.7 MB/s	DQ Read 383 DQ Write 292 DQ Mixed 201 187% 292 MB/s
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 86.1% Great: 105%
HGST Travelstar 5K1000 2.5" 1TB 129,581 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 929GB free Firmware: JA0OA710 SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 102 103 104 103 102 MB/s Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	58.1% Above average	Read 99.8 Write 98.2 Mixed 38 SusWrite 103 62% 84.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.6 115% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 58.1% Great: 57%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B1G73QH0-YK0 2x8GB 22,647 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way below expectations (0^th percentile)	12.2% Very poor	MC Read 3.9 MC Write 6.1 MC Mixed 4 13% 4.67 GB/s	SC Read 1.1 SC Write 3.6 SC Mixed 1.9 6% 2.2 GB/s	Latency 434 9% 434 ns
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 12.2% Great: 58%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Notebook Builds (Compare 7,808 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 3%

Tree trunk

Desktop 43%

Speed boat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

System: HP Notebook

CPU
Core i5-6200UIntelBench 41%, 135,462 samples	1,144x
Core i3-5005UIntelBench 38%, 50,603 samples	1,029x
Core i5-7200UIntelBench 45%, 205,332 samples	985x

GPU
HD 520 (Mobile Skylake)IntelBench 4%, 362,113 samples	2,495x
HD 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake)IntelBench 5%, 387,149 samples	1,737x
HD 5500 (Mobile 0.95 GHz)IntelBench 4%, 231,498 samples	1,180x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	248x
BX500 240GBCrucial $29Bench 56%, 142,801 samples	152x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	150x

RAM
M471B5173EB0-YK0 1x4GBSamsungBench 23%, 50,921 samples	399x
M471A1K43CB1-CRC 1x8GBSamsungBench 37%, 122,420 samples	377x
HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH 1x8GBHynixBench 37%, 144,145 samples	342x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 21% - Poor

Total price: $28

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16