Gigabyte B450 AORUS PRO WIFI

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Boot Drive67.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
SystemGigabyte B450 AORUS PRO WIFI
MotherboardGigabyte B450 AORUS PRO WIFI  (all builds)
Memory28.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200702
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 28 '20 at 15:15
Run Duration257 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
AMD Ryzen 7 1700X-$199
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
82% Excellent
Memory 80.5
1-Core 112
2-Core 219
79% 137 Pts
4-Core 448
8-Core 827
79% 638 Pts
64-Core 1,265
85% 1,265 Pts
Poor: 66%
This bench: 82%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$540
EVGA(3842 5180) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 446.14
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Lighting 397
Reflection 373
Parallax 395
104% 388 fps
Gravity 391
Splatting 203
132% 297 fps
Poor: 77% Great: 115%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
WD Green 120GB (2016)-$39
40GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Z3311000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 127 96 96 93 93 55 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
67.7% Good
Read 490
Write 277
Mixed 132
SusWrite 93
54% 248 MB/s
4K Read 24.5
4K Write 88.6
4K Mixed 22.8
113% 45.3 MB/s
DQ Read 144
DQ Write 249
DQ Mixed 21.7
66% 138 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 67.7%
Great: 68%
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$140
73GB free
Firmware: 3B7Q Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 718 643 643 643 642 640 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
205% Outstanding
Read 1,368
Write 1,148
Mixed 722
SusWrite 655
217% 973 MB/s
4K Read 42.4
4K Write 144
4K Mixed 60.2
218% 82.2 MB/s
DQ Read 978
DQ Write 966
DQ Mixed 777
637% 907 MB/s
Poor: 159%
This bench: 205%
Great: 257%
Crucial MX300 1TB-$269
433GB free
Firmware: M0C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 150 167 167 168 167 167 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
53.8% Above average
Read 331
Write 326
Mixed 216
SusWrite 164
58% 259 MB/s
4K Read 19
4K Write 59.4
4K Mixed 24.5
92% 34.3 MB/s
DQ Read 20.9
DQ Write 83.2
DQ Mixed 27
28% 43.7 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 53.8%
Great: 107%
XPG GAMMIX S11 Pro 1TB
864GB free
Firmware: 42AZS6AC
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2227 2232 2236 2236 2236 2236 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
358% Outstanding
Read 2,567
Write 2238
Mixed 248
SusWrite 2,234
407% 1,822 MB/s
4K Read 56.4
4K Write 130
4K Mixed 77.7
254% 87.9 MB/s
DQ Read 926
DQ Write 851
DQ Mixed 587
523% 788 MB/s
Poor: 186%
This bench: 358%
Great: 372%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$71
1.5TB free
Firmware: MX4OABB0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 174 176 177 178 178 177 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 176
Write 172
Mixed 21.3
SusWrite 176
98% 136 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.6
157% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 101%
Great: 110%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$40
635GB free
Firmware: CC47
SusWrite @10s intervals: 154 167 167 168 167 168 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
99.5% Outstanding
Read 182
Write 138
Mixed 72.8
SusWrite 165
102% 140 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.9
167% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 99.5%
Great: 115%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GB-$108
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2933 MHz
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
104% Outstanding
MC Read 40.4
MC Write 37.4
MC Mixed 35.5
108% 37.8 GB/s
SC Read 25.6
SC Write 39.9
SC Mixed 30.8
92% 32.1 GB/s
Latency 79.6
50% 79.6 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 104%
Great: 110%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical GA-B450 AORUS PRO WIFI-CF Builds (Compare 9,767 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 54%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 51%
Yacht

Motherboard: Gigabyte B450 AORUS PRO WIFI - $130

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 82% - Excellent Total price: $636
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9600K $180Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $230Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i7-9700K $300Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $170Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i5-9400F $145Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super) $500Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $43
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $43Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $66SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $64SanDisk Extreme 32GB $30
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Extreme 16GB $28
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback