Medion MD34112/C673

Performance Results


Gaming 120% UFO	Desktop 97% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 104% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	129% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	136% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

4 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	Medion MD34112/C673 (all builds)
Motherboard	MEDION GA-Z170X-Gaming 7
Memory	27.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170705
Uptime	1.1 Days
Run Date	Jul 27 '20 at 21:56
Run Duration	225 Seconds
Run User	NLD-User
Background CPU	8%

PC Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-7700K-$241 712,312 User benchmarks, average bench 84% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	93% Outstanding	Memory 94 1-Core 143 2-Core 273 95% 170 Pts	4-Core 495 8-Core 774 78% 635 Pts	64-Core 766 47% 766 Pts
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 93% Great: 92%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485 840,268 User benchmarks, average bench 124% Zotac(19DA 120F) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 391.01 Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	129% Outstanding	Lighting 180 Reflection 191 Parallax 190 146% 187 fps	MRender 123 Gravity 176 Splatting 128 116% 142 fps
Poor: 109% ↑ This bench: 129% Great: 133%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel 600p Series NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$119 20,782 User benchmarks, average bench 128% 166GB free (System drive) Firmware: PSF117C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 538 387 394 228 102 121 MB/s Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	136% Outstanding	Read 886 Write 532 Mixed 624 SusWrite 295 130% 584 MB/s	4K Read 33.9 4K Write 143 4K Mixed 53.8 196% 76.9 MB/s	DQ Read 503 DQ Write 506 DQ Mixed 465 360% 491 MB/s
Poor: 95% ↑ This bench: 136% Great: 144%
Samsung 850 Evo 2TB-$275 8,527 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 1.5TB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 445 462 472 481 468 466 MB/s Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	127% Outstanding	Read 457 Write 440 Mixed 383 SusWrite 466 98% 436 MB/s	4K Read 43 4K Write 121 4K Mixed 60.4 206% 74.7 MB/s	DQ Read 385 DQ Write 347 DQ Mixed 363 273% 365 MB/s
Poor: 78% ↑ This bench: 127% Great: 135%
Crucial MX500 1TB-$66 202,785 User benchmarks, average bench 106% 931GB free Firmware: M3CR010 SusWrite @10s intervals: 360 368 376 380 369 370 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	94.9% Outstanding	Read 340 Write 311 Mixed 298 SusWrite 371 74% 330 MB/s	4K Read 33.9 4K Write 80.5 4K Mixed 47.7 155% 54 MB/s	DQ Read 234 DQ Write 217 DQ Mixed 161 139% 204 MB/s
Poor: 75% ↑ This bench: 94.9% Great: 125%
WDC WD40EZRX-22SPEB0 16TB 5TB free Firmware: SN02 SusWrite @10s intervals: 184 173 171 165 170 179 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples		Read 176 Write 182 Mixed 104 SusWrite 174 36% 159 MB/s	4K Read 15.8 4K Write 7.6 4K Mixed 1 29% 8.13 MB/s

WD WD80PUZX-64NEAY0 8TB 356 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 6TB free Firmware: 80.H0A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 161 164 159 168 167 159 MB/s Performing above expectations (60^th percentile)	85.9% Excellent	Read 136 Write 141 Mixed 73.4 SusWrite 163 94% 128 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 1.1 201% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 85.9% Great: 99%
WD Red 8TB (2016)-$180 4,231 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 3.5TB free Firmware: 83.H0A83 SusWrite @10s intervals: 140 144 149 140 132 144 MB/s Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	80.5% Excellent	Read 139 Write 140 Mixed 68.6 SusWrite 141 89% 122 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 1.2 216% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 80.5% Great: 97%
Seagate IronWolf 12TB (2017)-$150 40 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 7TB free Firmware: SC60 SusWrite @10s intervals: 218 221 219 224 223 223 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 24% Great: 86%
Intenso Slim Line 64GB 27 User benchmarks, average bench 19% 60GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 17 20 17 22 MB/s Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	22% Poor	Read 91.7 Write 17.8 Mixed 38 SusWrite 18.9 45% 41.6 MB/s	4K Read 3.7 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 1.7 112% 2.2 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 22% Great: 43%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX 2400 C15 2x16GB 9,797 User benchmarks, average bench 78% 2 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	83.4% Excellent	MC Read 30.7 MC Write 31.9 MC Mixed 26.3 85% 29.6 GB/s	SC Read 17.4 SC Write 31.5 SC Mixed 24.5 70% 24.5 GB/s	Latency 59.8 67% 59.8 ns
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 83.4% Great: 95%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical MD34112/C673 Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 0%

Incomplete

Desktop 0%

Incomplete

Workstation 0%

Incomplete

System: Medion MD34112/C673

CPU
Core i7-7700KIntel $241Bench 84%, 712,312 samples	1x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	1x

RAM
HyperX 2400 C15 2x16GBKingstonBench 78%, 9,797 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 69% - Good

Total price: $726

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Medion MD34112/C673

Performance Results

Run History

PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

System: Medion MD34112/C673

Feedback

PC Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)