| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
| Graphics | 41% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 28.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Very high background CPU (91%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
| Motherboard | Asrock AB350 Pro4 (all builds) |
| Memory | 12.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz |
| Display | 1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20190614 |
| Uptime | 0.2 Days |
| Run Date | Jul 27 '20 at 18:38 |
| Run Duration | 130 Seconds |
| Run User | RUS-User |
| Background CPU | 91% |
PC Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
46.3%
Average
|
58% 98.3 Pts
|
25% 214 Pts
|
22% 349 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AMD RX 570-$130
Sapphire(1DA2 E387) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1284 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.4.2
Performing below potential (20th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
41%
Average
|
38% 63.6 fps
|
47% 59.1 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung 750 EVO 500GB
302GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MAT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 125 95 143 138 91 98 MB/s
|
28.2%
Poor
|
27% 121 MB/s
|
25% 9.93 MB/s
|
143% 193 MB/s
|
|
Seagate Barracuda Green 1.5TB-$130
1.5TB free
Firmware: CC3C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 75 92 100 107 95 MB/s
|
53.5%
Above average
|
62% 84.9 MB/s
|
98% 0.6 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
|
70.2%
Very good
|
76% 26.6 GB/s
|
45% 15.6 GB/s
|
38% 106 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical AB350 Pro4 Builds (Compare 1,979 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asrock AB350 Pro4 - $121
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Ryzen 5 1600AMD $110Bench 70%, 392,253 samples | 461x |
| Ryzen 5 2600AMD $155Bench 73%, 179,588 samples | 223x |
| Ryzen 5 1600XAMD $125Bench 74%, 140,440 samples | 131x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 201x |
| RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples | 166x |
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 114x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 85% - Excellent | Total price: $490 |