Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Memory	384GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 384GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon Platinum 8160 86 User benchmarks, average bench 72% CPU1, 1 CPU, 24 cores, 48 threads Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 1.85 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	72.3% Very good	Memory 82.7 1-Core 101 2-Core 149 67% 111 Pts	4-Core 333 8-Core 666 59% 499 Pts	64-Core 2,509 155% 2,509 Pts
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 72.3% Great: 82%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel SSDPEKKF256G8 256GB 50 User benchmarks, average bench 200% 4GB free (System drive) Firmware: 004P Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 1,789 Write 1,181 Mixed 1,090 299% 1,354 MB/s	4K Read 59.6 4K Write 158 4K Mixed 83.9 282% 101 MB/s	DQ Read 828 DQ Write 521 DQ Mixed 618 476% 656 MB/s
Poor: 126% Great: 263%
WD Elements 25A3 10TB 3,723 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 9TB free, PID 25a3 Operating at USB 3.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 196 197 186 200 195 194 MB/s Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	89.1% Excellent	Read 192 Write 161 Mixed 132 SusWrite 195 228% 170 MB/s	4K Read 2.6 4K Write 5.9 4K Mixed 1.2 251% 3.23 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 89.1% Great: 95%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M393A4K40CB2-CTD 12x31.9GB 35 User benchmarks, average bench 139% 12 of 16 slots used 383GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)	157% Outstanding	MC Read 62.7 MC Write 77 MC Mixed 60.2 190% 66.6 GB/s	SC Read 6.8 SC Write 6.6 SC Mixed 6.8 19% 6.73 GB/s	Latency 75.7 53% 75.7 ns
Poor: 90% ↑ This bench: 157% Great: 162%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 72%

Battleship

Desktop 78%

Battleship

Workstation 89%

Aircraft carrier

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon Silver 42101stBench 66%, 188 samples	1x
CPU: Intel Xeon Gold 61361stBench 77%, 180 samples	1x
CPU: Intel Xeon Platinum 81601stBench 72%, 86 samples	1x

GPU
Quadro RTX 4000NvidiaBench 98%, 9,173 samples	2x
Quadro P2000NvidiaBench 41%, 13,958 samples	1x
Quadro P400NvidiaBench 9%, 5,817 samples	1x

SSD
970 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $320Bench 327%, 38,669 samples	2x
Samsung SSD 970 2TBNvmeBench 331%, 10,220 samples	1x
SMC3108 240GBAvagoBench 71%, 3 samples	1x

RAM
18ASF2G72PDZ-2G6E1 12x16GBMicronBench 127%, 8 samples	1x
HMA82GR7AFR8N-VK 8x16GBHynixBench 98%, 145 samples	1x
M393A4K40CB2-CTD 12x31.9GBSamsungBench 139%, 35 samples	1x

Value: 51% - Above average

Total price: $320

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16