| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 67.4% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels. |
| Boot Drive | 44.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Asus M5A78L-M LX V2 (all builds) |
| Memory | 11.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.7 GHz |
| Display | 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit couleurs |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20161118 |
| Uptime | 11.2 Days |
| Run Date | Jul 27 '20 at 18:21 |
| Run Duration | 145 Seconds |
| Run User | CHE-User |
| Background CPU | 20% |
PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
68.7%
Good
|
62% 101 Pts
|
41% 327 Pts
|
26% 428 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)-$233
MSI(1462 8D94) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 451.67
Performing below potential (14th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
67.4%
Good
|
67% 75.7 fps
|
68% 84.7 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
81GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK71B1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 157 45 46 46 47 45 MB/s
|
44.3%
Average
|
29% 133 MB/s
|
86% 29.8 MB/s
|
86% 118 MB/s
|
|
CT1000BX500SSD1 1TB
233GB free
Firmware: M6CR030
SusWrite @10s intervals: 203 217 216 219 220 216 MB/s
|
59%
Above average
|
51% 228 MB/s
|
99% 35.6 MB/s
|
55% 105 MB/s
|
|
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37
293GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 163 163 161 164 166 165 MB/s
|
77%
Very good
|
80% 109 MB/s
|
226% 1.7 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM
Performing below potential (28th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
47.8%
Average
|
48% 17 GB/s
|
31% 10.8 GB/s
|
59% 67.7 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical M5A78L-M LX V2 Builds (Compare 216 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus M5A78L-M LX V2
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| FX-6300AMD $47Bench 55%, 261,607 samples | 43x |
| FX-4100AMD $110Bench 51%, 32,471 samples | 29x |
| FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples | 19x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 16x |
| Radeon 3000 GraphicsATIBench 1%, 21,841 samples | 14x |
| GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples | 12x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 88% - Excellent | Total price: $134 |