ECS B360H5-M2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (95th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 5 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.67% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive69.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardECS B360H5-M2  (all builds)
Memory13.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit색
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190826
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 27 '20 at 02:11
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User KOR-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron G4900-$42
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
62.4% Good
Memory 91.5
1-Core 100
2-Core 201
76% 131 Pts
4-Core 196
8-Core 199
26% 197 Pts
64-Core 198
12% 198 Pts
Poor: 35%
This bench: 62.4%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 610
Elitegroup(1019 A4A5) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7263
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
3.67% Terrible
Lighting 3.3
Reflection 5.31
Parallax 3.81
3% 4.14 fps
MRender 7
Gravity 3.23
Splatting 9.22
6% 6.48 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.67%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HFS128G32MND-2200A 128GB
88GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 20200L00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 163 168 170 170 171 171 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
69.4% Good
Read 448
Write 172
Mixed 206
SusWrite 169
55% 249 MB/s
4K Read 21.2
4K Write 79.7
4K Mixed 24.3
106% 41.7 MB/s
DQ Read 252
DQ Write 169
DQ Mixed 179
142% 200 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 69.4%
Great: 72%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A1G43EB1-CPB 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
83.2% Excellent
MC Read 25.6
MC Write 33.7
MC Mixed 29.1
84% 29.5 GB/s
SC Read 17.1
SC Write 34.2
SC Mixed 25.3
73% 25.5 GB/s
Latency 64.9
62% 64.9 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 83.2%
Great: 79%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback