Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 21% Surfboard	Desktop 87% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 18% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	23.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asrock H470 Phantom Gaming 4 (all builds)
Memory	4.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200417
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jul 26 '20 at 07:57
Run Duration	144 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	12%

PC Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-10320 620 User benchmarks, average bench 90% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (46^th percentile)	89.3% Excellent	Memory 94.7 1-Core 137 2-Core 250 91% 161 Pts	4-Core 453 8-Core 674 70% 563 Pts	64-Core 754 47% 754 Pts
Poor: 81% ↑ This bench: 89.3% Great: 97%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon RX 560-B 49,289 User benchmarks, average bench 20% XFX(1682 956D) 2GB CLim: 1196 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 20.5.1 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	23.4% Poor	Lighting 28 Reflection 30.7 Parallax 33.1 23% 30.6 fps	MRender 29.1 Gravity 27.2 Splatting 32.1 24% 29.5 fps
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 23.4% Great: 22%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45 240,629 User benchmarks, average bench 199% 63GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B7Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 2,087 Write 1,334 Mixed 636 296% 1,352 MB/s	4K Read 53.8 4K Write 145 4K Mixed 61.3 237% 86.7 MB/s	DQ Read 1,166 DQ Write 1,017 DQ Mixed 758 659% 980 MB/s
Poor: 142% Great: 236%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43 381,216 User benchmarks, average bench 273% 125GB free Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 2,570 Write 2,348 Mixed 1,423 469% 2,114 MB/s	4K Read 66.6 4K Write 159 4K Mixed 88.2 298% 105 MB/s	DQ Read 1,246 DQ Write 1,155 DQ Mixed 1,218 909% 1,206 MB/s
Poor: 199% Great: 340%
WD Blue 2.5" 1TB (2011)-$75 18,569 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 417GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 97 97 98 97 95 MB/s Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)	51.5% Above average	Read 83 Write 88.8 Mixed 47.8 SusWrite 96.1 58% 78.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.8 150% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 51.5% Great: 63%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 8ATF1G64AZ-2G6H1 1x8GB 5,278 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 1 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	45.5% Average	MC Read 17.8 MC Write 16.2 MC Mixed 11.9 44% 15.3 GB/s	SC Read 12.8 SC Write 12.6 SC Mixed 11.8 35% 12.4 GB/s	Latency 58 69% 58 ns
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 45.5% Great: 48%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 127%

UFO

Desktop 92%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 115%

UFO

GPU
RTX 3070Nvidia $400Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	31x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	24x
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $233Bench 71%, 428,800 samples	21x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	17x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	11x
SA2000M8500G 500GBKingstonBench 197%, 87,883 samples	9x

RAM
Aegis DDR4 3000 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $38Bench 82%, 163,634 samples	16x
Fury 2666 C16 2x8GBHyperX $75Bench 82%, 134,977 samples	12x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	10x

Value: 100% - Outstanding

Total price: $579

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16