Asrock Z390 Phantom Gaming X

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 87%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 88%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 101%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics82% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive317% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
MotherboardAsrock Z390 Phantom Gaming X  (all builds)
Memory50.8 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191129
Uptime7.7 Days
Run DateJul 25 '20 at 21:49
Run Duration235 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU8%
Watch Gameplay: 1660-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-9900K-$410
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Memory 87.2
1-Core 158
2-Core 316
101% 187 Pts
4-Core 618
8-Core 1,072
102% 845 Pts
64-Core 1592
98% 1592 Pts
Poor: 89%
This bench: 101%
Great: 104%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti-$143
Asus(1043 86A5) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2190 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 451.48
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
82% Excellent
Lighting 106
Reflection 94.2
Parallax 90.9
87% 97.1 fps
MRender 102
Gravity 90.2
Splatting 80.2
73% 90.9 fps
Poor: 70%
This bench: 82%
Great: 81%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata XPG SX8200 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$80
749GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 42AZS6AC Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1603 1631 1701 1705 1715 1718 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
317% Outstanding
Read 2,437
Write 1,891
Mixed 188
SusWrite 1,679
344% 1,549 MB/s
4K Read 53.3
4K Write 118
4K Mixed 71
234% 80.6 MB/s
DQ Read 1153
DQ Write 826
DQ Mixed 587
548% 855 MB/s
Poor: 175%
This bench: 317%
Great: 372%
Hitachi HUA723030ALA640 3TB-$71
1.5TB free
Firmware: MKAOAA50
SusWrite @10s intervals: 126 125 125 127 127 126 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
70.2% Very good
Read 119
Write 125
Mixed 80.6
SusWrite 126
83% 113 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 1
192% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 70.2%
Great: 87%
Samsung Spinpoint F3 1TB-$83
918GB free
Firmware: 1AJ10001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 128 122 126 127 126 124 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
63.4% Good
Read 95.3
Write 102
Mixed 60.5
SusWrite 125
70% 95.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.7
146% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 63.4%
Great: 75%
SanDisk Ultra Fit USB 3.0 32GB-$16
26GB free, PID 5583
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 68 30 30 29 29 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
39.1% Below average
Read 155
Write 55.8
Mixed 68.2
SusWrite 41.5
92% 80.1 MB/s
4K Read 6.3
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 1.7
149% 3.33 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 39.1%
Great: 38%
Samsung Flash Drive FIT 128GB
72GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 46 39 40 39 39 39 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
33.5% Below average
Read 140
Write 47.5
Mixed 42.8
SusWrite 40.1
76% 67.6 MB/s
4K Read 4.7
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 2.4
136% 2.73 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 33.5%
Great: 117%
SanDisk Cruzer 64GB
58GB free, PID 5530
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9 7.4 8 8.1 7.8 8.1 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
9.18% Terrible
Read 22.6
Write 9
Mixed 10.7
SusWrite 8
15% 12.6 MB/s
4K Read 4.6
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 2.6
140% 2.73 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 9.18%
Great: 17%
SanDisk Ultra USB 3.0 123GB
108GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 59 37 37 37 37 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
41.2% Average
Read 140
Write 45.5
Mixed 90.3
SusWrite 46.1
96% 80.6 MB/s
4K Read 5.4
4K Write 3.1
4K Mixed 3.2
234% 3.9 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 41.2%
Great: 40%
Verbatim 64GB
2GB free, PID 0304
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.2 7.3 4.7 8.1 8 8.8 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
6.88% Terrible
Read 26.6
Write 2
Mixed 9
SusWrite 6.3
11% 11 MB/s
4K Read 7
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
26% 2.33 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 6.88%
Great: 9%
PNY USB 2.0 FD 64GB
51GB free, PID 00d4
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 7.1 16 13 16 15 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
10.6% Very poor
Read 30.1
Write 4.2
Mixed 12.2
SusWrite 14.8
18% 15.3 MB/s
4K Read 5.1
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.9
70% 2.2 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 10.6%
Great: 11%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4-3200C16-32GTRG 2x31.5GB
2 of 4 slots used
63GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
78% Very good
MC Read 28.7
MC Write 30.2
MC Mixed 24.1
79% 27.7 GB/s
SC Read 15.4
SC Write 33.5
SC Mixed 22.6
68% 23.8 GB/s
Latency 70.3
57% 70.3 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 78%
Great: 115%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z390 Phantom Gaming X Builds (Compare 107 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 153%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 152%
UFO

Motherboard: Asrock Z390 Phantom Gaming X

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 89% - Excellent Total price: $941
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback