Asrock N68-GS

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 31%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 34.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics0.57% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock N68-GS  (all builds)
Memory6.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100421
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 24 '20 at 19:19
Run Duration161 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon II X3 445-$100
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 3 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
34.9% Below average
Memory 47.4
1-Core 45.7
2-Core 90.8
36% 61.3 Pts
4-Core 131
8-Core 130
18% 131 Pts
64-Core 134
8% 134 Pts
Poor: 35%
This bench: 34.9%
Great: 51%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI Radeon HD 2400-PRO
Sapphire(174B E400) 256MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.970.100.7000
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
0.57% Terrible
Lighting 0.67
Reflection 1.31
Parallax 0.41
0% 0.79 fps
MRender 0.86
Gravity 0.13
Splatting 1.17
1% 0.72 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.57%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvidia STRIPE 149.06G 160GB
79GB free (System drive)
SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 59 91 89 97 113 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
46.8% Average
Read 76.8
Write 83.9
Mixed 26.9
SusWrite 86.2
50% 68.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.7
127% 1 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 46.8%
Great: 73%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR2
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
21.5% Poor
MC Read 8.3
MC Write 5.9
MC Mixed 8.5
22% 7.57 GB/s
SC Read 5.3
SC Write 5.7
SC Mixed 6.2
16% 5.73 GB/s
Latency 171
24% 171 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 21.5%
Great: 65%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $46
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback