Asus STRIX H270F GAMING

Performance Results


Gaming 24% Surfboard	Desktop 71% Battleship	Workstation 20% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	31.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	48% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (42%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus STRIX H270F GAMING (all builds)
Memory	6.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170323
Uptime	7.2 Days
Run Date	Jul 24 '20 at 02:18
Run Duration	130 Seconds
Run User	CHL-User
Background CPU	42%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-7400-$110 234,266 User benchmarks, average bench 64% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)	61.7% Good	Memory 73.9 1-Core 92.7 2-Core 172 65% 113 Pts	4-Core 281 8-Core 319 39% 300 Pts	64-Core 337 21% 337 Pts
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 61.7% Great: 73%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Asus(1043 85D1) CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 432.00 Performing way above expectations (85^th percentile)	31.4% Below average	Lighting 40.5 Reflection 27.8 Parallax 33.7 33% 34 fps	MRender 34.1 Gravity 36.8 Splatting 33 28% 34.6 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 31.4% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$32 166,392 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 25GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFK71E0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 22 123 22 6.3 14 MB/s Performing below potential (18^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	48% Average	Read 196 Write 101 Mixed 239 SusWrite 51 33% 147 MB/s	4K Read 21.4 4K Write 63.4 4K Mixed 17.7 89% 34.2 MB/s	DQ Read 162 DQ Write 321 DQ Mixed 135 133% 206 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 48% Great: 85%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$39 1,120,098 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 771GB free Firmware: CC43 SusWrite @10s intervals: 176 179 181 177 181 177 MB/s Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)	102% Outstanding	Read 177 Write 177 Mixed 81.2 SusWrite 178 112% 153 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.6 128% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 102% Great: 113%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 2400 C15 2x8GB 13,788 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (10^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	59.7% Above average	MC Read 23 MC Write 23.9 MC Mixed 19.5 63% 22.1 GB/s	SC Read 10.7 SC Write 17.8 SC Mixed 13.4 40% 14 GB/s	Latency 92.7 43% 92.7 ns
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 59.7% Great: 94%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical STRIX H270F GAMING Builds (Compare 1,797 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 53%

Yacht

Desktop 90%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 45%

Yacht

Motherboard: Asus STRIX H270F GAMING - $250

CPU
Core i7-7700KIntel $242Bench 84%, 712,312 samples	471x
Core i7-7700Intel $167Bench 76%, 256,717 samples	421x
Core i5-7500Intel $89Bench 67%, 149,467 samples	189x

GPU
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	202x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	193x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	151x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	74x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	69x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	52x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	69x
HyperX 2400 C15 2x8GBKingstonBench 76%, 122,822 samples	62x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C14 2x8GBCorsair $42Bench 73%, 66,222 samples	46x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 85% - Excellent

Total price: $751

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16