Alienware 15 R2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 37%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (11th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 89 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 19.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics26.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive68.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (44%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAlienware 15 R2  (all builds)
MotherboardAlienware 06D1WD
Memory9.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190530
Uptime2.2 Days
Run DateJul 24 '20 at 00:06
Run Duration163 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU 44%

 PC Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 0.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
19.8% Very poor
Memory 30.5
1-Core 22.8
2-Core 32.8
19% 28.7 Pts
4-Core 51.9
8-Core 62.7
7% 57.3 Pts
64-Core 98
6% 98 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 19.8%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970M
Dell(1028 0708) 3GB
CLim: 1038 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 353.62
Performing below potential (15th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
26.6% Poor
Lighting 30
Reflection 38.4
Parallax 36.2
24% 34.8 fps
MRender 41.1
Gravity 38
Splatting 34.9
31% 38 fps
Poor: 25%
This bench: 26.6%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung PM951 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB
97GB free (System drive)
Firmware: BXV77D0Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 181 173 162 173 160 111 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
68.7% Good
Read 696
Write 212
Mixed 243
SusWrite 160
72% 328 MB/s
4K Read 16.6
4K Write 41.8
4K Mixed 19.4
72% 25.9 MB/s
DQ Read 210
DQ Write 195
DQ Mixed 181
142% 195 MB/s
Poor: 77%
This bench: 68.7%
Great: 147%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43
457GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 643 695 736 688 770 779 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
113% Outstanding
Read 825
Write 814
Mixed 914
SusWrite 718
185% 818 MB/s
4K Read 20.8
4K Write 27.3
4K Mixed 31.2
86% 26.4 MB/s
DQ Read 157
DQ Write 215
DQ Mixed 170
133% 181 MB/s
Poor: 178%
This bench: 113%
Great: 355%
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 2.5" 1TB
139GB free
Firmware: JB0OA3W0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 81 81 82 82 81 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
57.6% Above average
Read 120
Write 118
Mixed 21.7
SusWrite 81.2
62% 85.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.6
124% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 57.6%
Great: 75%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 16ATF1G64HZ-2G1A2 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
41.7% Average
MC Read 14.6
MC Write 16.1
MC Mixed 18.6
47% 16.4 GB/s
SC Read 5.5
SC Write 8.8
SC Mixed 7.7
21% 7.33 GB/s
Latency 252
16% 252 ns
Poor: 48%
This bench: 41.7%
Great: 76%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 15 R2 Builds (Compare 874 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: Alienware 15 R2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback