Gigabyte GA-Z370 AORUS Gaming WIFI-CF

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 86% Aircraft carrier	Desktop 90% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 81% Aircraft carrier


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	95.4% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	Gigabyte Z370 AORUS Gaming WIFI
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-Z370 AORUS Gaming WIFI-CF (all builds)
Memory	11.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170921
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Jul 23 '20 at 20:31
Run Duration	137 Seconds
Run User	DOM-User
Background CPU	8%

PC Performing as expected (55^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-8700K-$186 746,287 User benchmarks, average bench 88% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	90.5% Outstanding	Memory 96.3 1-Core 129 2-Core 264 91% 163 Pts	4-Core 455 8-Core 814 76% 635 Pts	64-Core 1,093 68% 1,093 Pts
Poor: 76% ↑ This bench: 90.5% Great: 100%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-Ti-$299 412,133 User benchmarks, average bench 94% Asus(1043 861E) CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 451.67 Performing below potential (75^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	95.4% Outstanding	Lighting 122 Reflection 136 Parallax 114 100% 124 fps	MRender 90.8 Gravity 121 Splatting 106 87% 106 fps
Poor: 86% ↑ This bench: 95.4% Great: 101%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43 367,854 User benchmarks, average bench 276% 88GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 2,543 Write 2,347 Mixed 1,737 491% 2,209 MB/s	4K Read 65.1 4K Write 167 4K Mixed 89.1 301% 107 MB/s	DQ Read 1,281 DQ Write 1,127 DQ Mixed 1,198 900% 1,202 MB/s
Poor: 178% Great: 355%
WD WD10EURX 1TB-$25 53,598 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 25GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 67 68 68 68 67 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	40% Below average	Read 72 Write 64.2 Mixed 60.5 SusWrite 66.8 49% 65.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 0.7 149% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 40% Great: 87%
Seagate Momentus 2.5" 1TB 266,123 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 556GB free Firmware: 2AR10001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 92 93 94 94 94 MB/s Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	50.7% Above average	Read 84.5 Write 58.5 Mixed 48.3 SusWrite 92.2 52% 70.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.7 124% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 50.7% Great: 59%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance LED DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$161 35,811 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	88.9% Excellent	MC Read 35.8 MC Write 32.2 MC Mixed 26.4 90% 31.5 GB/s	SC Read 19.5 SC Write 29.7 SC Mixed 28.7 74% 26 GB/s	Latency 52.9 76% 52.9 ns
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 88.9% Great: 110%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-Z370 AORUS Gaming WIFI-CF Builds (Compare 718 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 110%

UFO

Desktop 91%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 100%

UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z370 AORUS Gaming WIFI-CF

CPU
Core i7-8700KIntel $186Bench 88%, 746,287 samples	323x
Core i5-8600KIntel $173Bench 91%, 264,837 samples	138x
Core i7-8700Intel $200Bench 87%, 349,567 samples	51x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	86x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	58x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	55x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	24x
Blue SN550 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBWD $74Bench 228%, 180,890 samples	16x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	14x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	22x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C15 2x8GBCorsair $60Bench 81%, 93,353 samples	16x
Trident Z RGB DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $55Bench 84%, 215,644 samples	14x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 71% - Very good

Total price: $794

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16