PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 15.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 49.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
Memory | 12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Gigabyte GA-EX58-UD3R (all builds) |
Memory | 8.8 GB free of 12 GB @ 0.4 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20091224 |
Uptime | 0.7 Days |
Run Date | Jul 23 '20 at 15:21 |
Run Duration | 180 Seconds |
Run User | USA-User |
Background CPU | 2% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i7-920-$90
Socket 1366, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg)
|
69.7%
Good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 750-$120
CLim: 1293 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 451.48
|
15.4%
Very poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
73GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 166 184 180 180 180 MB/s
|
49.1%
Average
|
|||
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
39GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 123 167 191 190 185 181 MB/s
|
50.2%
Above average
|
|||
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70
163GB free
Firmware: CC46
SusWrite @10s intervals: 55 70 80 80 80 80 MB/s
|
45.9%
Average
|
|||
52.4%
Above average
|
||||
Multi Flash Reader 8GB
7GB free, PID 6366
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.9 7.3 7.4 7.4 7.4 7.4 MB/s
|
3.6%
Terrible
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown 3x4GB
3 of 4 slots used
12GB DIMM
|
43.3%
Average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7-920Intel $90Bench 62%, 69,074 samples | 284x |
Core i7-950Intel $100Bench 66%, 36,389 samples | 26x |
Xeon X5670IntelBench 73%, 9,061 samples | 26x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 27x |
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples | 27x |
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 21x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 85% - Excellent | Total price: $377 |