Asus P5K

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Tree trunk	Desktop 28% Raft	Workstation 0% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 30.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	1.24% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (89%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus P5K (all builds)
Memory	1.3 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display	1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colori
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20081014
Uptime	1.2 Days
Run Date	Jul 23 '20 at 12:02
Run Duration	219 Seconds
Run User	ITA-User
Background CPU	89%

PC Performing as expected (50^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Duo E7600-$191 4,159 User benchmarks, average bench 40% LGA775, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 3.05 GHz Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	30.2% Below average	Memory 53.3 1-Core 31.8 2-Core 36.8 29% 40.6 Pts	4-Core 43.6 8-Core 45.5 6% 44.5 Pts	64-Core 75.2 5% 75.2 Pts
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 30.2% Great: 46%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 210 98,254 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Asus(1043 83F4) 1GB Ram: 1GB, Driver: 342.01 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	1.24% Terrible	Lighting 1.3 Reflection 2.58 Parallax 0.53 1% 1.47 fps	MRender 2.71 Gravity 0.3 Splatting 2.61 2% 1.87 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.24% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
SiI RAID 1 Set 0 500GB 18 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 388GB free Firmware: 1100 SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 39 39 37 41 24 MB/s Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	35% Below average	Read 85.3 Write 39.3 Mixed 43.8 SusWrite 36.4 38% 51.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.8 144% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 35% Great: 39%
WD My Book 1140 3TB 6,710 User benchmarks, average bench 37% 73GB free, PID 1140 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 78 77 73 83 48 MB/s Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	38.2% Below average	Read 96.5 Write 92.8 Mixed 54.5 SusWrite 71.8 104% 78.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.7 4K Mixed 1 129% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 38.2% Great: 59%
WD 10EAVS External 1TB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 810GB free, PID 0910 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 19 19 19 20 13 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	15.7% Very poor	Read 29.7 Write 25.2 Mixed 24 SusWrite 17.9 32% 24.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 0.9 114% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 15.7% Great: 21%
Generic Flash Disk 4GB 16,068 User benchmarks, average bench 4% 4GB free, PID 6387 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.7 5.7 5.5 5.4 5.5 4.4 MB/s Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	5.04% Terrible	Read 18.8 Write 5.5 Mixed 4.8 SusWrite 5.3 9% 8.6 MB/s	4K Read 4.9 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 18% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 5.04% Great: 7%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x2GB 446,702 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 2 of 4 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR2 Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	13.5% Very poor	MC Read 4.6 MC Write 3.9 MC Mixed 4.3 12% 4.27 GB/s	SC Read 4.3 SC Write 3.6 SC Mixed 3.9 11% 3.93 GB/s	Latency 149 27% 149 ns
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 13.5% Great: 44%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P5K Builds (Compare 356 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 10%

Tree trunk

Desktop 50%

Yacht

Workstation 8%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P5K - $65

CPU
Core2 Quad Q6600Intel $100Bench 42%, 59,658 samples	91x
Core2 Quad Q9550Intel $161Bench 49%, 34,093 samples	34x
Core2 Quad Q9650Intel $170Bench 51%, 16,719 samples	24x

GPU
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples	13x
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples	13x
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples	12x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	12x
840 Evo 120GBSamsung $85Bench 91%, 104,444 samples	9x
A400 120GBKingston $29Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	8x

RAM
4x2GBUnknownBench 25%, 183,252 samples	153x
6GBUnknownBench 25%, 111,301 samples	58x
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples	42x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 46% - Average

Total price: $285

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $274	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16