Asus G1S

Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 40% Jet ski	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 40.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	1.7% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

System	Asus G1S (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK G1S
Memory	1.6 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20071225
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Jul 23 '20 at 09:05
Run Duration	197 Seconds
Run User	RUS-User
Background CPU	4%

PC Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Duo T7700-$100 1,898 User benchmarks, average bench 37% Socket 478, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	40.3% Average	Memory 72.1 1-Core 27.9 2-Core 53.5 36% 51.2 Pts	4-Core 53 8-Core 54.2 7% 53.6 Pts	64-Core 54.1 3% 54.1 Pts
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 40.3% Great: 43%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 8600M GT 2,041 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Asus(1043 1515) 256MB Ram: 256MB, Driver: 342.01 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	1.7% Terrible	Lighting 1.77 Reflection 3.46 Parallax 0.62 1% 1.95 fps	MRender 3.57 Gravity 1.53 Splatting 2.96 2% 2.69 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.7% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Msft Virtual Disk 86GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 48GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 169 123 108 100 105 120 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
Poor: 45% Great: 75%
Samsung 860 EVO 250G 250GB 3,453 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 110GB free Firmware: RVT0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 54 6.6 6.7 5.9 6 6.6 MB/s Performing below potential (9^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	52.5% Above average	Read 251 Write 241 Mixed 230 SusWrite 14.4 41% 184 MB/s	4K Read 27.1 4K Write 42 4K Mixed 32.2 105% 33.8 MB/s	DQ Read 204 DQ Write 195 DQ Mixed 199 150% 199 MB/s
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 52.5% Great: 122%
Hitachi HTS541616J9SA00 160GB-$82 3,253 User benchmarks, average bench 18% 43GB free Firmware: SB4OC70P SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.7 6.6 6.7 5.9 6.1 6.6 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	10.2% Very poor	Read 28.4 Write 30 Mixed 19.4 SusWrite 6.9 16% 21.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.5 97% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 10.2% Great: 25%
Seagate BACKUP+ 500GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 94% 137GB free, PID ab20 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 6.7 6.7 5.7 6.2 14 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	18.6% Very poor	Read 96 Write 83.3 Mixed 47.7 SusWrite 9.2 72% 59 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 0.8 4K Mixed 0.8 58% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 18.6% Great: 296%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x2GB 446,702 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 2 of 2 slots used 4GB SODIMM DDR2 Performing below potential (8^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	10.4% Very poor	MC Read 2.8 MC Write 1.8 MC Mixed 3.7 8% 2.77 GB/s	SC Read 2.8 SC Write 2.2 SC Mixed 1.6 6% 2.2 GB/s	Latency 96.6 41% 96.6 ns
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 10.4% Great: 44%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical G1S Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 34%

Sail boat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

System: Asus G1S

CPU
Core2 Duo T7500Intel $90Bench 35%, 4,281 samples	3x

GPU
GeForce 8600M GTNvidiaBench 1%, 2,041 samples	3x

SSD
X25-M 80GBIntelBench 34%, 12,660 samples	1x

RAM
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples	2x
3GBUnknownBench 14%, 81,553 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 48% - Average

Total price: $90

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16