Asus TUF B360-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results


Gaming 43% Speed boat	Desktop 93% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 36% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	42.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	95.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus TUF B360-PLUS GAMING (all builds)
Memory	5.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200220
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jul 22 '20 at 19:42
Run Duration	127 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	26%

Watch Gameplay How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-9400F-$102 299,482 User benchmarks, average bench 85% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	93.3% Outstanding	Memory 93.4 1-Core 130 2-Core 259 90% 161 Pts	4-Core 510 8-Core 677 75% 593 Pts	64-Core 726 45% 726 Pts
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 93.3% Great: 91%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$155 259,091 User benchmarks, average bench 43% Asus(1043 86C3) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 2005 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 451.67 Performing below potential (66^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	42.9% Average	Lighting 55.9 Reflection 52.5 Parallax 49.5 46% 52.6 fps	MRender 43.1 Gravity 47.7 Splatting 47.2 38% 46 fps
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 42.9% Great: 46%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Gigabyte UD PRO 256GB-$49 2,163 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 198GB free (System drive) Firmware: SAFM13.2 SusWrite @10s intervals: 238 247 237 266 274 282 MB/s Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	95.4% Outstanding	Read 472 Write 415 Mixed 376 SusWrite 257 85% 380 MB/s	4K Read 33.5 4K Write 88 4K Mixed 40.7 150% 54.1 MB/s	DQ Read 322 DQ Write 342 DQ Mixed 204 189% 290 MB/s
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 95.4% Great: 103%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70 337,642 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 479GB free Firmware: CC46 SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 96 94 98 99 97 MB/s Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	55.2% Above average	Read 95.7 Write 97.7 Mixed 60 SusWrite 96.6 64% 87.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.9 165% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 55.2% Great: 68%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 1x8GB-$25 15,542 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 1 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	48.3% Average	MC Read 18.4 MC Write 17.9 MC Mixed 12.5 46% 16.3 GB/s	SC Read 11.6 SC Write 16 SC Mixed 14.9 40% 14.2 GB/s	Latency 61.2 65% 61.2 ns
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 48.3% Great: 50%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF B360-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 2,019 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 79%

Battleship

Desktop 87%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 66%

Battle cruiser

Motherboard: Asus TUF B360-PLUS GAMING - $105

CPU
Core i5-9400FIntel $102Bench 85%, 299,482 samples	537x
Core i5-8400Intel $131Bench 82%, 312,220 samples	254x
Core i7-8700Intel $200Bench 87%, 349,567 samples	251x

GPU
RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	217x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	146x
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $240Bench 71%, 428,800 samples	105x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	90x
660p NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBIntel $60Bench 156%, 162,275 samples	84x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	45x

RAM
Fury 2666 C16 2x8GBHyperX $75Bench 82%, 134,977 samples	127x
HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBKingstonBench 86%, 239,203 samples	72x
BLS8G4D26BFSBK.8FD 2x8GBCrucialBench 82%, 12,603 samples	54x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 76% - Very good

Total price: $634

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16