HP 520-1000cs

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 37%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 36.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics1% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP 520-1000cs  (all builds)
MotherboardPEGATRON 2AC3
Memory1.2 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110930
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJul 21 '20 at 23:39
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User SVK-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing below expectations (28th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium G620-$30
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
36.5% Below average
Memory 53
1-Core 67
2-Core 133
48% 84.4 Pts
4-Core 114
8-Core 132
16% 123 Pts
64-Core 128
8% 128 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 36.5%
Great: 53%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)
HP(103C 2AC3) 1.8GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1% Terrible
Lighting 1.07
Reflection 1.31
Parallax 0.94
1% 1.1 fps
MRender 1.62
Gravity 0.8
Splatting 2
1% 1.47 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi HDS721010CLA632 1TB-$109
738GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JP4OA41A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 38 51 103 96 98 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
52.6% Above average
Read 107
Write 102
Mixed 57.3
SusWrite 76.4
63% 85.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.8
142% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 52.6%
Great: 76%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT351S6BFR8C-H9 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 1067 MHz
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
17.4% Very poor
MC Read 5.7
MC Write 6
MC Mixed 5.7
17% 5.8 GB/s
SC Read 3.5
SC Write 5.5
SC Mixed 5.6
14% 4.87 GB/s
Latency 150
27% 150 ns
Poor: 13%
This bench: 17.4%
Great: 29%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback