Asus Z270-WS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics31.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive201% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 2 years ago.
MotherboardAsus Z270-WS  (all builds)
Memory15.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190409
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateJul 21 '20 at 22:36
Run Duration253 Seconds
Run User MLT-User
Background CPU 20%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700-$167
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
78.7% Very good
Memory 82.5
1-Core 116
2-Core 224
79% 141 Pts
4-Core 404
8-Core 593
62% 498 Pts
64-Core 569
35% 569 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 78.7%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 432.00
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
31.8% Below average
Lighting 39.4
Reflection 31.3
Parallax 37.6
32% 36.1 fps
MRender 38.3
Gravity 39
Splatting 37.1
31% 38.1 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 31.8%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43
190GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 643 394 402 384 378 392 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
201% Outstanding
Read 2,195
Write 1,524
Mixed 1,209
SusWrite 432
297% 1,340 MB/s
4K Read 45.7
4K Write 93.1
4K Mixed 60.9
197% 66.6 MB/s
DQ Read 661
DQ Write 498
DQ Mixed 594
440% 584 MB/s
Poor: 199%
This bench: 201%
Great: 340%
Samsung 850 Pro 256GB-$125
86GB free
Firmware: EXM04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 326 397 420 433 425 434 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
100% Outstanding
Read 461
Write 435
Mixed 359
SusWrite 406
93% 415 MB/s
4K Read 29.5
4K Write 73
4K Mixed 39.1
134% 47.2 MB/s
DQ Read 378
DQ Write 332
DQ Mixed 320
250% 344 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 100%
Great: 124%
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$130
502GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 424 429 347 311 321 324 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
104% Outstanding
Read 458
Write 422
Mixed 389
SusWrite 359
92% 407 MB/s
4K Read 35.3
4K Write 78
4K Mixed 46.5
154% 53.3 MB/s
DQ Read 372
DQ Write 330
DQ Mixed 335
256% 346 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 104%
Great: 133%
Seagate Archive HDD 8TB (2015)-$130
20TB free
Firmware: AR17
SusWrite @10s intervals: 148 151 153 153 151 153 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 21% Great: 87%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 2x16GB-$74
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (30th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
70% Very good
MC Read 25.9
MC Write 27
MC Mixed 22.7
72% 25.2 GB/s
SC Read 13.9
SC Write 25.2
SC Mixed 19.5
56% 19.5 GB/s
Latency 76
53% 76 ns
Poor: 50%
This bench: 70%
Great: 94%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z270-WS Builds (Compare 74 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 88%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 75%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus Z270-WS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 65% - Good Total price: $724
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback