Gigabyte GA-A320M-S2H-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics45.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive111% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemGigabyte A320M-S2H
MotherboardGigabyte GA-A320M-S2H-CF  (all builds)
Memory13.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191128
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 21 '20 at 14:59
Run Duration149 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 11%
Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 3200G-$75
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
47.4% Average
Memory 75.3
1-Core 90.2
2-Core 104
57% 89.7 Pts
4-Core 116
8-Core 115
16% 116 Pts
64-Core 115
7% 115 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 47.4%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130
CLim: 1268 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 20.5.1
Performing below potential (69th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
45.9% Average
Lighting 55.6
Reflection 64.7
Parallax 70.9
45% 63.7 fps
MRender 64.7
Gravity 54.7
Splatting 54.1
47% 57.8 fps
Poor: 37%
This bench: 45.9%
Great: 49%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 QVO 1TB-$109
372GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVQ02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 349 445 445 478 478 478 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
111% Outstanding
Read 490
Write 460
Mixed 400
SusWrite 445
101% 449 MB/s
4K Read 30.6
4K Write 95.1
4K Mixed 45.7
155% 57.1 MB/s
DQ Read 373
DQ Write 349
DQ Mixed 359
270% 360 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 111%
Great: 121%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37
461GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 59 61 60 59 60 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
26% Poor
Read 30.4
Write 56.3
Mixed 28.6
SusWrite 60
32% 43.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.5
82% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 26%
Great: 109%
Toshiba External USB HDD 750GB
466GB free, PID a004
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.8 9.1 9 9.3 9.4 9.5 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
12.6% Very poor
Read 34.5
Write 33.8
Mixed 25.5
SusWrite 9
33% 25.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.5
80% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 12.6%
Great: 19%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown BL8G26C16U4B.8FD 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
77.6% Very good
MC Read 22.6
MC Write 35.6
MC Mixed 24
78% 27.4 GB/s
SC Read 21.5
SC Write 32
SC Mixed 25.6
75% 26.4 GB/s
Latency 89.8
44% 89.8 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 77.6%
Great: 96%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-A320M-S2H-CF Builds (Compare 7,634 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-A320M-S2H-CF - $70

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 88% - Excellent Total price: $428
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback