Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 47%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (32%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5 M 560-$65 10,722 User benchmarks, average bench 41% rBGA1288 Socket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.65 GHz Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	47% Average	Memory 64.3 1-Core 73.5 2-Core 136 54% 91.4 Pts	4-Core 174 8-Core 173 23% 173 Pts	64-Core 174 11% 174 Pts
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 47% Great: 48%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
WD Blue 2.5" 500GB-$21 80,932 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 449GB free (System drive) Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 66 76 74 72 76 76 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	23% Poor	Read 6.8 Write 18.2 Mixed 28.1 SusWrite 73.3 23% 31.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.2 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 0.2 42% 0.33 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 23% Great: 61%
SanDisk Ultra Fit USB 3.0 32GB-$16 13,359 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 26GB free, PID 5583 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 17 15 14 14 14 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	9.73% Terrible	Read 26.9 Write 15.4 Mixed 16.5 SusWrite 14.7 23% 18.4 MB/s	4K Read 3.3 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 1 67% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 9.73% Great: 38%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 1x4GB 154,807 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 1 of 2 slots used 4GB SODIMM DDR3 Performing below potential (29^th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	19.6% Very poor	MC Read 6.5 MC Write 6.9 MC Mixed 6.7 19% 6.7 GB/s	SC Read 6.4 SC Write 5.5 SC Mixed 0.1 11% 4 GB/s	Latency 116 35% 116 ns
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 19.6% Great: 52%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 41%

Speed boat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD Graphics (Arrandale 0.667/0.766 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 99,513 samples	36x

SSD
THNSNC128GMLJ 128GBToshibaBench 31%, 189 samples	5x
Agility 3 120GBOCZ $102Bench 49%, 38,562 samples	1x
840 Evo 120GBSamsung $85Bench 91%, 104,444 samples	1x

Value: 62% - Good

Total price: $65

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16