PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (14th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 86 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
Graphics | 23.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 49.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
Memory | 18GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 18GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asrock 870 Extreme3 (all builds) |
Memory | 11 GB free of 18 GB @ 0.7 GHz |
Display | 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20100914 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Jul 20 '20 at 15:52 |
Run Duration | 220 Seconds |
Run User | AUT-User |
Background CPU | 0% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD Phenom II X4 955-$83
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
|
47.5%
Average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD HD 7950-$290
Gigabyte(1458 254C) 3GB
CLim: 1000 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 20.5.1
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
23.4%
Poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
INTENSO 128GB
23GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S8FM06.6
SusWrite @10s intervals: 122 91 67 24 116 114 MB/s
|
49.9%
Average
|
|||
Sandisk PLUS 120GB
10GB free
Firmware: UE4500RL
|
||||
Seagate ST3250410AS 250GB-$95
65GB free
Firmware: 4.AAA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6 8.2 12 7.7 9.2 11 MB/s
|
||||
WD Elements SE 25FE 1TB
79GB free, PID 25fe
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 26 27 27 27 27 MB/s
|
17.8%
Very poor
|
|||
Generic STORAGE DEVICE 16GB
15GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.7 7.3 6.1 7.9 5 7.4 MB/s
|
4.08%
Terrible
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
20.4%
Poor
|
||||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Phenom II X4 955AMD $83Bench 51%, 41,403 samples | 15x |
Phenom II X6 1090TAMD $240Bench 57%, 23,506 samples | 8x |
Phenom II X4 965AMD $144Bench 53%, 43,442 samples | 7x |
GPU | |
---|---|
Radeon HD 4670ATIBench 4%, 21,442 samples | 4x |
Radeon HD 7350AMDBench 1%, 193 samples | 3x |
R7 250AMDBench 8%, 25,802 samples | 3x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 58% - Above average | Total price: $112 |