Performance Results


Gaming 6% Tree trunk	Desktop 36% Jet ski	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 33.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	8.06% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	43.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (34%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

PC Performing as expected (44^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-9830P APU (2016 M.BR) 4,052 User benchmarks, average bench 40% Socket FP4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (20^th percentile)	33.3% Below average	Memory 39.4 1-Core 30 2-Core 90.4 30% 53.3 Pts	4-Core 158 8-Core 162 21% 160 Pts	64-Core 166 10% 166 Pts
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 33.3% Great: 50%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon R7 Graphics 6,884 User benchmarks, average bench 4% Acer(1025 1213) 512MB Ram: 512MB, Driver: 17.7 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	8.06% Terrible	Lighting 9.93 Reflection 11.7 Parallax 13.8 8% 11.8 fps	MRender 8.57 Gravity 10.2 Splatting 10.3 8% 9.68 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 8.06% Great: 6%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
HFS128G39TND-N210A 128GB 41,519 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 37GB free (System drive) Firmware: 30001P10 SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 93 91 89 87 85 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	43.4% Average	Read 343 Write 126 Mixed 143 SusWrite 92 39% 176 MB/s	4K Read 17.2 4K Write 22.5 4K Mixed 16.3 59% 18.7 MB/s	DQ Read 141 DQ Write 128 DQ Mixed 108 88% 125 MB/s
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 43.4% Great: 70%
WD WD10SPZX-00HKTT0 1TB 294,991 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 583GB free Firmware: 02.01A02 SusWrite @10s intervals: 50 53 58 59 59 59 MB/s Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	82.3% Excellent	Read 230 Write 3.3 Mixed 71.7 SusWrite 56.3 67% 90.2 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 4.2 4K Mixed 0.4 176% 1.97 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 82.3% Great: 79%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH 2x8GB 71,691 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 1200 MHz Performing way below expectations (0^th percentile)	22.3% Poor	MC Read 9.8 MC Write 6 MC Mixed 9 24% 8.27 GB/s	SC Read 4.4 SC Write 3.6 SC Mixed 5.9 13% 4.63 GB/s	Latency 205 20% 205 ns
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 22.3% Great: 79%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16