Performance Results


Gaming 14% Tree trunk	Desktop 70% Battleship	Workstation 12% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	15.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	42.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7 860-$339 51,451 User benchmarks, average bench 64% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	67.8% Good	Memory 94.1 1-Core 70.6 2-Core 139 63% 101 Pts	4-Core 226 8-Core 355 36% 291 Pts	64-Core 357 22% 357 Pts
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 67.8% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GT 1030 185,384 User benchmarks, average bench 14% MSI(1462 8C98) 2GB CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 441.87 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	15.8% Very poor	Lighting 19.5 Reflection 15.5 Parallax 18.7 16% 17.9 fps	MRender 16.4 Gravity 19.3 Splatting 20.7 16% 18.8 fps
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 15.8% Great: 15%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial MX200 500GB-$90 17,487 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 9GB free (System drive) Firmware: MU05 SusWrite @10s intervals: 47 77 46 43 43 43 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	42.9% Average	Read 239 Write 149 Mixed 221 SusWrite 49.7 37% 165 MB/s	4K Read 19.3 4K Write 44.1 4K Mixed 21.3 80% 28.2 MB/s	DQ Read 197 DQ Write 60.9 DQ Mixed 68.9 66% 109 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 42.9% Great: 105%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT125U6BFR8C-H9 4x2GB 703 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 4 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM 1333 MHz Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	42.7% Average	MC Read 16.2 MC Write 13.7 MC Mixed 13 41% 14.3 GB/s	SC Read 11 SC Write 10.5 SC Mixed 12.8 33% 11.4 GB/s	Latency 59.7 67% 59.7 ns
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 42.7% Great: 52%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 58%

Gunboat

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

GPU
Quadro FX 580NvidiaBench 2%, 5,936 samples	34x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	33x
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples	21x

RAM
M378B5673FH0-CH9 4x2GBSamsungBench 42%, 2,488 samples	24x
16GBUnknownBench 41%, 70,565 samples	9x
HMT351U6CFR8C-H9 4x4GBHynixBench 48%, 2,925 samples	5x

Value: 58% - Above average

Total price: $367

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16