| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
| Graphics | 32.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Memory | 32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Asus TUF X299 MARK 2 (all builds) |
| Memory | 10 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20190214 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Jul 20 '20 at 03:20 |
| Run Duration | 161 Seconds |
| Run User | USA-User |
| Background CPU | 19% |
PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
74%
Very good
|
53% 91.8 Pts
|
68% 580 Pts
|
87% 1,409 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 390.77
|
32.3%
Below average
|
33% 37 fps
|
31% 38.1 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
1,572% 7027 MB/s
|
1,734% 522 MB/s
|
1,056% 1,347 MB/s
| |
|
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
49GB free
Firmware: EMT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 410 305 302 303 302 303 MB/s
|
91.1%
Outstanding
|
91% 407 MB/s
|
127% 41.8 MB/s
|
212% 285 MB/s
|
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 4x8GB
4 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
|
80.6%
Excellent
|
93% 32.6 GB/s
|
22% 7.6 GB/s
|
49% 82.4 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical TUF X299 MARK 2 Builds (Compare 1,648 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus TUF X299 MARK 2
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i7-7800XIntel $216Bench 78%, 22,334 samples | 493x |
| Core i7-7820XIntel $375Bench 80%, 28,524 samples | 260x |
| Core i7-7740XIntel $281Bench 87%, 5,094 samples | 148x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples | 168x |
| GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples | 151x |
| RTX 2080-TiNvidia $441Bench 156%, 357,946 samples | 92x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 74% - Very good | Total price: $795 |