Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Tree trunk	Desktop 22% Surfboard	Workstation 0% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 25.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	0.92% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD E-450 APU 9,307 User benchmarks, average bench 26% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.65 GHz, turbo 1.65 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (45^th percentile)	25.2% Poor	Memory 45 1-Core 18.6 2-Core 27.3 22% 30.3 Pts	4-Core 32.5 8-Core 40.1 5% 36.3 Pts	64-Core 33.7 2% 33.7 Pts
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 25.2% Great: 39%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6320 8,182 User benchmarks, average bench 1% HP(103C 2AC7) 384MB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.0 Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	0.92% Terrible	Lighting 1.07 Reflection 1.54 Parallax 1.31 1% 1.31 fps	MRender 1.38 Gravity 0.67 Splatting 1.61 1% 1.22 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 0.92% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Hitachi HDS721050CLA662 500GB 14,997 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 452GB free (System drive) Firmware: JP2OA41A SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 67 67 63 56 63 MB/s Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	43.2% Average	Read 87.3 Write 78.2 Mixed 44.3 SusWrite 63.3 50% 68.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.6 107% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 43.2% Great: 76%
PNY USB 2.0 FD 16GB 22 User benchmarks, average bench 7% 10GB free, PID 00c2 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.7 4.3 5.5 5.4 6.5 6.6 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	4.45% Terrible	Read 18.5 Write 2.8 Mixed 4.3 SusWrite 5.3 8% 7.72 MB/s	4K Read 2.6 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 10% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 4.45% Great: 8%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B5273DH0-CH9 1x4GB 18,713 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 1 of 2 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz Performing below potential (5^th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	11.7% Very poor	MC Read 3.9 MC Write 3.3 MC Mixed 4.5 11% 3.9 GB/s	SC Read 2.3 SC Write 2.2 SC Mixed 3.1 7% 2.53 GB/s	Latency 180 22% 180 ns
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 11.7% Great: 29%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16