Asus TUF B450-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (10th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 90 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics35.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (37%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
MotherboardAsus TUF B450-PLUS GAMING  (all builds)
Memory0.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181029
Uptime3 Days
Run DateJul 19 '20 at 17:23
Run Duration143 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 37%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 1600X-$125
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
60.8% Good
Memory 60.4
1-Core 98.3
2-Core 171
62% 110 Pts
4-Core 329
8-Core 564
54% 446 Pts
64-Core 893
55% 893 Pts
Poor: 62%
This bench: 60.8%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 451.67
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
35.5% Below average
Lighting 44.8
Reflection 45.5
Parallax 42.3
36% 44.2 fps
MRender 40.2
Gravity 41.3
Splatting 40.8
33% 40.8 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 35.5%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingmax 240GB 240GB
17GB free (System drive)
Firmware: H190117H
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 386
Write 432
Mixed 415
92% 411 MB/s
4K Read 31.2
4K Write 61.7
4K Mixed 27.4
115% 40.1 MB/s
DQ Read 184
DQ Write 120
DQ Mixed 192
133% 165 MB/s
Poor: 41% Great: 95%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$39
753GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 155 165 158 171 144 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
71.4% Very good
Read 96.7
Write 130
Mixed 40.7
SusWrite 152
76% 105 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.7
129% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 71.4%
Great: 113%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37
209GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 120 118 115 114 83 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
66.5% Good
Read 120
Write 94
Mixed 52
SusWrite 111
69% 94.3 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1.2
240% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 66.5%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 1x8GB-$25
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 1067 MHz
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
31.1% Below average
MC Read 12.4
MC Write 9.1
MC Mixed 11.6
32% 11 GB/s
SC Read 8.1
SC Write 7.1
SC Mixed 8.9
23% 8.03 GB/s
Latency 126
32% 126 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 31.1%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF B450-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 5,383 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 78%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 73%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus TUF B450-PLUS GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Excellent Total price: $480
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback