| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (20th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 80 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 27.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor. |
| Graphics | 0.16% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 31.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
| Memory | 4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Very high background CPU (33%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
| System | Toshiba Satellite A100 (all builds) |
| Motherboard | Intel MPAD-MSAE Customer Reference Boards |
| Memory | 0.7 GB free of 4 GB @ 0 GHz |
| Display | 1280 x 800 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20060612 |
| Uptime | 2.9 Days |
| Run Date | Jul 19 '20 at 09:11 |
| Run Duration | 128 Seconds |
| Run User | PRT-User |
| Background CPU | 33% |
PC Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel T2400
U1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.85 GHz
|
27.4%
Poor
|
24% 32 Pts
|
4% 29.4 Pts
|
2% 30.2 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
ATI Mobility Radeon X1400
Toshiba(1179 FF10) 256MB
Driver: atiumdag.dll Ver. 8.561.0.0
|
0.16%
Terrible
|
0% 0.52 fps
| ||
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston SSDNow UV400 120GB-$35
21GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0C3J96R9
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 97 56 52 30 76 MB/s
|
31.2%
Below average
|
22% 98.9 MB/s
|
66% 22 MB/s
|
23% 34.4 MB/s
|
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR
|
11.1%
Very poor
|
10% 3.47 GB/s
|
9% 3 GB/s
|
25% 160 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical Satellite A100 Builds (Compare 8 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: Toshiba Satellite A100
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core2 T5500Intel $18Bench 32%, 1,616 samples | 3x |
| Core2 T5200IntelBench 29%, 307 samples | 2x |
| Core2 T7200Intel $80Bench 32%, 2,351 samples | 1x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GeForce Go 7300NvidiaBench 0%, 116 samples | 4x |
| GeForce Go 7600NvidiaBench 0%, 397 samples | 3x |
| Mobility Radeon X1400ATIBench 0%, 468 samples | 1x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 43% - Average | Total price: $55 |