Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-9750H 328,182 User benchmarks, average bench 73% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	83% Excellent	Memory 82.9 1-Core 126 2-Core 242 84% 150 Pts	4-Core 447 8-Core 656 69% 552 Pts	64-Core 748 46% 748 Pts
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 83% Great: 87%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Apple APPLE SSD AP0512 500GB 54 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 110GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1110 SusWrite @10s intervals: 1494 1539 1284 942 883 877 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 37% Great: 68%
Samsung Portable SSD T5 500GB 14,526 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 54GB free Firmware: 0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 269 261 267 215 178 160 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	51.8% Above average	Read 380 Write 294 Mixed 231 SusWrite 225 63% 282 MB/s	4K Read 16.5 4K Write 21.8 4K Mixed 17.4 59% 18.6 MB/s	DQ Read 120 DQ Write 85.7 DQ Mixed 108 79% 104 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 51.8% Great: 97%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMA81GS6CJR8N-VK 2x8GB 28,425 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing below potential (14^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	64% Good	MC Read 25.6 MC Write 22.1 MC Mixed 19.2 64% 22.3 GB/s	SC Read 15.3 SC Write 25.3 SC Mixed 20.8 58% 20.5 GB/s	Latency 75.4 53% 75.4 ns
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 64% Great: 84%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 35%

Sail boat

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 31%

Sail boat

GPU
Radeon Pro 5500MAMDBench 39%, 2,080 samples	24x
Radeon Pro 5300MAMDBench 34%, 1,013 samples	24x
RTX 3060-TiNvidia $340Bench 128%, 442,467 samples	5x

SSD
Portable SSD T5 1TBSamsungBench 77%, 13,039 samples	12x
ASM1153E 500GBInateckBench 63%, 102 samples	3x
Portable SSD T5 2TBSamsungBench 75%, 2,362 samples	3x

RAM
8ATF1G64HZ-2G6E1 2x8GBMicronBench 76%, 20,226 samples	30x
HMA81GS6CJR8N-VK 2x8GBHynixBench 74%, 28,425 samples	20x
MT40A2G8NEA-062E:J 2x16GBMicronBench 85%, 515 samples	14x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16